We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :)
Please help by posting all issues here.
The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
No. All this would do is penalize legal gun owners for acting lawfully. (Criminals wouldn't insure.) Most victims of gun violence are suicides and, obviously, wouldn't collect.
No. All this would do is penalize legal gun owners for acting lawfully. (Criminals wouldn't insure.) Most victims of gun violence are suicides and, obviously, wouldn't collect.
[h=1]What do you think?
(Note: This is an unscientific poll.)[/h] Should gun owners be required to carry insurance?
Yes. It would make people think twice about buying semi-automatic weapons and having large arsenals because the insurance costs would be high. And it would compensate victims of gun violence. (24 responses)
11%
No. All this would do is penalize legal gun owners for acting lawfully. (Criminals wouldn't insure.) Most victims of gun violence are suicides and, obviously, wouldn't collect. (86 responses)
41%
Yes. Car owners must have insurance; why not gun owners? (29 responses)
14%
No. Driving a car is a privilege. Owning a weapon is a right protected by the Constitution. Mandatory insurance would turn insurers into regulators. (73 responses)
34%