• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Failure to seek input about the Board of Firearms Permit Examiners and the Courts

Edward Peruta

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2007
Messages
1,247
Location
Connecticut USA
You would think that the sponsor of the bill to eliminate the Board of Firearms would have attempted to seek some input from Judicial. NOT THIS TIME.
READ THIS

From: Hebert, Rhonda [mailto:Rhonda.StearleyHebert@jud.ct.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 8:42 AM
To: Edward Peruta
Subject: Answer to your question

Hi there,

You asked: Has anybody from the Legislaturesought input or comments from Judicial about firearms appeals being handled by Judicial?

I checked, and the answer is no.

Rhonda Stearley-Hebert
Program Manager of Communications
Connecticut Judicial Branch
860-757-2270
 
Last edited:

davidmcbeth

Banned
Joined
Jan 14, 2012
Messages
16,167
Location
earth's crust
As a matter of course, the judiciary rarely gets involved with legislation ... it creates a conflict when cases get to them ... because testimony given to the legislature is allowed to be introduced into evidence at trials ..


You can certainly bring up court cases & the good, the bad, and the ugly of things ...
 
Last edited:
Top