Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Senator Grassley Defends Constitution on NPR

  1. #1
    Centurion
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Yuma, Arizona, USA
    Posts
    923

    Senator Grassley Defends Constitution on NPR

    I heard Senator Charles Grassley on the Weekend Edition Sunday show of National Public Radio. I expected that he would buckle, and at least leave the door open for "universal background checks" as a way to appease the statists and move us toward universal gun registration. I was wrong.

    Senator Grassley surprised me by standing up to the MSM bullies. He did not say "we have to do *something*". He did not say *for the children*. He was smart. He did not fall for their implied assumptions that more unconstitutional infringements mean more safety.

    He was willing to look at making sure that felons who attempted to purchase guns illegally in the current system, were forwarded to the FBI for prosecution. This was an indirect and effective way to say that we are not even using the system we have, so why make an even bigger system to do less? If pushed, he could have mentioned that there were only 77 prosecutions out of 72,000 background check denials in 2009, and they resulted in only 32 convictions.

    He was willing to look at ways to get more information on people with mental problems into the FBI database, but worried about privacy concerns.

    He was not willing to support "universal background checks". He addressed the intrusive nature of such a system by mentioning that he could not support requiring a father to submit to a background check to give a rifle to his son. He mentioned that background checks would be ineffective, because they would not stop the theft of firearms, as happened in Newtown. Lastly, he said that we have to treat the Second Amendment with as much care as we treat the First Amendment. He said that we would like to put limits on violent movies, but even though we know they have an effect on young people, we do not, because of the First Amendment, and we have to treat the Second Amendment with the same level of respect.

    This was brilliant. He also stated that he could not support an assault weapon ban, because we already tried that, and it did not work from 1994 to 2004.

    I was and am impressed. It was gratifying to see a senator stand up to the MSM. It was doubly impressive because he is the ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee.

    Link to NPR audio

    Link to Source with Background Check numbers

    Dean Weingarten

    http://gunwatch.blogspot.com/2013/02...stitution.html

  2. #2
    Founder's Club Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Fairfax Co., VA
    Posts
    18,766
    I can't think of a single sitting senator who would defend the constitution and be genuine while doing it. If any of them really did, they'd stand out like Ron Paul.

    Grassley is just going with the direction he thinks the wind is blowing or taking a politically expedient stance. He in no way genuinely supports the constitution, except maybe the part about senators getting paid.
    Last edited by Citizen; 02-10-2013 at 06:20 PM.
    I'll make you an offer: I will argue and fight for all of your rights, if you will do the same for me. That is the only way freedom can work. We have to respect all rights, all the time--and strive to win the rights of the other guy as much as for ourselves.

    If I am equal to another, how can I legitimately govern him without his express individual consent?

    There is no human being on earth I hate so much I would actually vote to inflict government upon him.

  3. #3
    Centurion
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Yuma, Arizona, USA
    Posts
    923

    We must make him believe that it is in his interest to support the Constitution

    Quote Originally Posted by Citizen View Post
    I can't think of a single sitting senator who would defend the constitution and be genuine while doing it. If any of them really did, they'd stand out like Ron Paul.

    Grassley is just going with the direction he thinks the wind is blowing or taking a politically expedient stance. He in no way genuinely supports the constitution, except maybe the part about senators getting paid.
    At least he is not an ideologue dedicated to the destrution of the U.S. A.

  4. #4
    Founder's Club Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Fairfax Co., VA
    Posts
    18,766
    Quote Originally Posted by ccwinstructor View Post
    At least he is not an ideologue dedicated to the destrution of the U.S. A.
    Right. He's dedicated to himself, and the destruction of the USA is just a side-effect.
    I'll make you an offer: I will argue and fight for all of your rights, if you will do the same for me. That is the only way freedom can work. We have to respect all rights, all the time--and strive to win the rights of the other guy as much as for ourselves.

    If I am equal to another, how can I legitimately govern him without his express individual consent?

    There is no human being on earth I hate so much I would actually vote to inflict government upon him.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •