MainelyGlock
Regular Member
Yet another example of why Feinstein's ban will once again do NOTHING to stop crime.
http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&sid=24126723
http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&sid=24126723
-
We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
-
If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
-
Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.
Ruger Mini-14 Will Be Both Legal AND Illegal Under Gun Ban
- Thread starter MainelyGlock
- Start date
davidmcbeth
Banned
"If (the two sides) could have a reasonable conversation in a room, maybe we would have the right list of guns on the table," she said.
You freaking botch ! There is no such "list" and attempting to make one is idiotic.
If you really need a list, here's an appropriate one: anyone or all
You freaking botch ! There is no such "list" and attempting to make one is idiotic.
If you really need a list, here's an appropriate one: anyone or all
arentol
New member
Love this quote from the article:
"Martindale said a better option to Feinstein's legislation wasn't likely to surface with the current divide.
"If (the two sides) could have a reasonable conversation in a room, maybe we would have the right list of guns on the table," she said."
The problem is that there is no reason to have this "reasonable conversation" because, by definition, it would be entirely unreasonable. The only reasonable discussion would be about getting most AOW's, and all SBS's and SBR's off the ban list, not adding things to that list. And how can you have a "reasonable conversation" with someone who thinks a barrel shroud, or adjustable stock, or foregrip (not that they even KNOW what these things are) makes a firearm more dangerous rather than the same or less?
"Martindale said a better option to Feinstein's legislation wasn't likely to surface with the current divide.
"If (the two sides) could have a reasonable conversation in a room, maybe we would have the right list of guns on the table," she said."
The problem is that there is no reason to have this "reasonable conversation" because, by definition, it would be entirely unreasonable. The only reasonable discussion would be about getting most AOW's, and all SBS's and SBR's off the ban list, not adding things to that list. And how can you have a "reasonable conversation" with someone who thinks a barrel shroud, or adjustable stock, or foregrip (not that they even KNOW what these things are) makes a firearm more dangerous rather than the same or less?
Last edited:
eye95
Well-known member
When leftists ask for reasonability or compromise, the only thing they will accept is a complete cave.
The only thing I will accept is a complete cave by the leftists. But I am not pretending to ask for reasonability or compromise, just that the right thing be done.
The only thing I will accept is a complete cave by the leftists. But I am not pretending to ask for reasonability or compromise, just that the right thing be done.