Love this quote from the article:
"Martindale said a better option to Feinstein's legislation wasn't likely to surface with the current divide.
"If (the two sides) could have a reasonable conversation in a room, maybe we would have the right list of guns on the table," she said."
The problem is that there is no reason to have this "reasonable conversation" because, by definition, it would be entirely unreasonable. The only reasonable discussion would be about getting most AOW's, and all SBS's and SBR's off the ban list, not adding things to that list. And how can you have a "reasonable conversation" with someone who thinks a barrel shroud, or adjustable stock, or foregrip (not that they even KNOW what these things are) makes a firearm more dangerous rather than the same or less?