OC for ME
Regular Member
Do I advocate for such? No.
Illuminating my fellow citizens to the liberal mindset regarding liability insurance schemes or a onerous tax is warranted. Obamacare has shown us, once again, who liberals are and what they desire.
We have a right to own property and thus we have a right to purchase a car (with our property, our money). I believe that we do have a right to drive our property on the public roads and not to be taxed for mere ownership of the car. We are taxed via fuel taxes that are in addition to the fuel sales transaction to maintain the public roads. Car property taxes go to other segments of the government and not to maintain the roads, at least mine do.
I view a tax for mere ownership of any of my property to be unconstitutional yet I must pay a tax or be penalized.
Firearm liability insurance (and a yearly ownership tax) is a means to the liberal end, to make firearm ownership as difficult as possible for the less than affluent citizen. Liberals can not infringe upon our right. However, if we cannot afford to own a firearm, even after lawful purchase, that is our problem and not a constitutional issue thanks to SCOTUS.
I'll betcha a dollar to a doughnut that the liberals would never go along with a tax for not owning a firearm and then we being exempt from the tax once ownership is confirmed.....via registration of course. Which could require liability insurance to complete the retail sales transaction.
We must have liability insurance at a minimum to operate our car on the public roads. And we must pay a yearly tax to permit driving on the public roads. Don't pay your yearly tax, or have insurance, no registration for you, and thus no lawful operation on the public roads.
Illuminating my fellow citizens to the liberal mindset regarding liability insurance schemes or a onerous tax is warranted. Obamacare has shown us, once again, who liberals are and what they desire.
We have a right to own property and thus we have a right to purchase a car (with our property, our money). I believe that we do have a right to drive our property on the public roads and not to be taxed for mere ownership of the car. We are taxed via fuel taxes that are in addition to the fuel sales transaction to maintain the public roads. Car property taxes go to other segments of the government and not to maintain the roads, at least mine do.
I view a tax for mere ownership of any of my property to be unconstitutional yet I must pay a tax or be penalized.
Firearm liability insurance (and a yearly ownership tax) is a means to the liberal end, to make firearm ownership as difficult as possible for the less than affluent citizen. Liberals can not infringe upon our right. However, if we cannot afford to own a firearm, even after lawful purchase, that is our problem and not a constitutional issue thanks to SCOTUS.
I'll betcha a dollar to a doughnut that the liberals would never go along with a tax for not owning a firearm and then we being exempt from the tax once ownership is confirmed.....via registration of course. Which could require liability insurance to complete the retail sales transaction.
We must have liability insurance at a minimum to operate our car on the public roads. And we must pay a yearly tax to permit driving on the public roads. Don't pay your yearly tax, or have insurance, no registration for you, and thus no lawful operation on the public roads.
