Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: House Bill 3200

  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    K Falls, Oregon, USA
    Posts
    13

    House Bill 3200

    Essentially outlaws most modern firearms in state of Oregon, and/or requires registration and inspection.

    http://www.leg.state.or.us/13reg/mea...3200.intro.pdf

  2. #2
    Regular Member Haunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Central Point, Oregon
    Posts
    12

    House Bill 3200

    I just want to go out and find a liberal to hug really hard and express my joy at being saved from all these weapons of mass protection (not).
    God deliver us from these fools!

  3. #3
    Regular Member We-the-People's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    White City, Oregon, USA
    Posts
    2,234
    According to OFF the bill was written by CeasefireOregon and its legislative sponsor is backing away as fast as he can now that the calls and emails are coming in.
    "The Second Amendment speaks nothing to an unfettered Right". (Post # 100)
    "Restrictions are not infringements. Bans are infringements.--if it reaches beyond Reasonable bans". (Post # 103)
    Beretta92FSLady
    http://forum.opencarry.org/forums/sh...ons-Bill/page5

    Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer, nothing in any of my posts should be considered legal advice. If you need legal advice, consult a reputable attorney, not an internet forum.

  4. #4
    Regular Member Haunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Central Point, Oregon
    Posts
    12

    House Bill 3200

    I noticed that Buckley was listed as a co-sponsor to HB3200. Maybe he needs a little attention as well? I think I will send him a little note.

  5. #5
    Regular Member Difdi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Seattle, Washington, USA
    Posts
    996
    That has to be the most blatant gun grab masquerading as an assault weapons ban I've ever seen. The differences are subtle, but they're there...

    Section 2 (C) (i) would tend to prohibit trigger guards as written. The definition of barrel shroud is even worse...it would define every single wood-stock hunting rifle I've ever seen in my life as having a barrel shroud.

    Amazing...

  6. #6
    Regular Member We-the-People's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    White City, Oregon, USA
    Posts
    2,234
    Quote Originally Posted by Difdi View Post
    That has to be the most blatant gun grab masquerading as an assault weapons ban I've ever seen. The differences are subtle, but they're there...

    Section 2 (C) (i) would tend to prohibit trigger guards as written. The definition of barrel shroud is even worse...it would define every single wood-stock hunting rifle I've ever seen in my life as having a barrel shroud.

    Amazing...
    Yup. The entire purpose of the forestock of a long gun is to provide a place to hold the weapon and keep you from burning yourself on the barrel......the very way they define "barrel shroud". Makes you wonder if they've ever even seen a firearm.
    "The Second Amendment speaks nothing to an unfettered Right". (Post # 100)
    "Restrictions are not infringements. Bans are infringements.--if it reaches beyond Reasonable bans". (Post # 103)
    Beretta92FSLady
    http://forum.opencarry.org/forums/sh...ons-Bill/page5

    Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer, nothing in any of my posts should be considered legal advice. If you need legal advice, consult a reputable attorney, not an internet forum.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •