Raggs
Regular Member
From an OCer
"I dropped off a registration in Waterford today, and noticed a problem. There was a sign requiring approval of all carried firearms by the desk sgt. This is in violation of 1102, "regulate in any other manner" part of preemption. I was wondering if you could start a thread on OCDO or MOC about this. Waterford has a long record of making up the rules as they go, and this should be brought to light. Link to pic below.
http://i765.photobucket.com/albums/xx294/stainless1911/WaterfordPDsign001_zps518d77ec.jpg
When I called to question the sign, the officer asked me what I wanted him do do about it. I replied that he should take it down, as it is not in compliance with state law. He replied snarkingly, "Duly Noted" and hung up."
Whether you like the OCer is not really the point. a local govt seems to be messing with peoples rights.
"I dropped off a registration in Waterford today, and noticed a problem. There was a sign requiring approval of all carried firearms by the desk sgt. This is in violation of 1102, "regulate in any other manner" part of preemption. I was wondering if you could start a thread on OCDO or MOC about this. Waterford has a long record of making up the rules as they go, and this should be brought to light. Link to pic below.
http://i765.photobucket.com/albums/xx294/stainless1911/WaterfordPDsign001_zps518d77ec.jpg
When I called to question the sign, the officer asked me what I wanted him do do about it. I replied that he should take it down, as it is not in compliance with state law. He replied snarkingly, "Duly Noted" and hung up."
Whether you like the OCer is not really the point. a local govt seems to be messing with peoples rights.