From Freedom Outpost.com (Fair Use):For details go to http://lastresistance.com/1527/teen-...-gun-violence/ I am certain we won't hear about it from the lamestream media.We live in a strange world; a world where someone doing something right can be punished; a world where stopping violence leads to unfortunate consequences. Ever since the spate of recent shootings, all gun related incidents are garnering huge attention. A student wearing a Marines tee shirt, with guns on it, was punished; a kindergartener with a toy gun gets severely punished; the most ridiculous and innocuous incidents are overreacted to. Now, we have yet another incident–in this case, someone stopping potential violence–which was greatly overreacted to.
Lately, I've been thinking about something that, at this point in time, doesn't seem too farfetched. I've wrestled with the question, "How long will it be before we can be arrested and charged with child abuse, for taking our kids or grandkids somewhere to shoot (other than the local mall )?" Even if we don't leave our property to do so, will we be criminalized just for the act of familiarizing them with the proper safety, function and use of a firearm? I firmly believe that this is the direction the liberal left desires to move our legislators, and the legislative process. Has that thought crossed the mind of anyone else?
Whose fault is it that our educators are brainwashed liberals? A large part of the problem is that our colleges and universities are staffed by graduates from the 1960's onward. Our "institutions of higher learning" have become bastions of liberalism, stemming from the drug and free love subculture of the 1960's. These are the people who trained (indoctrinated) today's teachers. Conservative educators must be extremely careful if they wish to have a successful career in education, or to achieve tenure, as the overall policy is one of ongoing liberal political indoctrination. This young man showed tremendous courage and leadership ability, which are both traits that the left fears. He should be given a medal for his quick action, and the entire school board should be fired for their reaction. Effemall! Pax...
Last edited by Gil223; 03-04-2013 at 05:44 PM. Reason: typo
The problem includes the imbecilic application of rules. I am guessing, in order to avoid being held responsible for not applying a rule.
I'll make you an offer: I will argue and fight for all of your rights, if you will do the same for me. That is the only way freedom can work. We have to respect all rights, all the time--and strive to win the rights of the other guy as much as for ourselves.
If I am equal to another, how can I legitimately govern him without his express individual consent?
There is no human being on earth I hate so much I would actually vote to inflict government upon him.
Involved, well, all the kids on that bus were involved. The true reason for this "no good deed shall go unpunished" moment is that the kid did not cooperate. The state shall not tolerate uncooperative citizens. How many times is this scenario repeated? Uncooperative citizen is unjustly and in most instances unlawfully sanctioned by a state jack-booted drone.The apparent reasoning behind the suspension was not only that the teen was “involved” in the incident, but that he refused to cooperate when questioned. According to his mother, he was scared.
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson.
"Better that ten guilty persons escape, than that one innocent suffer" - English jurist William Blackstone.It is AFAIK original to me. Compromise is failure on the installment plan, particularly when dealing with so intractable an opponent as ignorance. - Nightmare