Rockford Supt weapons would make schools more dangerous

Raggs said:

Rockford superintendent explains why concealed weapons would make schools more dangerous

http://www.mlive.com/news/grand-rap...perintendent_explai.html#incart_river_default

Click to expand...

FreeInAZ said:

“You have the security personnel who’s trying to deal with that situation, he or she may not even know who the shooter really is,” Shibler said. “By the time they figure it out they could be killed.”[/I]

Click to expand...

FreeInAZ said:

Snip from story:

I was close but this guy is slicker than most anti's He's got his priorities straight as he never even mentions the "children".:shocker:

Snip
What makes concealed weapons in a school so dangerous is the possibility of a police officer responding to a report of a school shooter first encountering an armed teacher, he said.

“You have the security personnel who’s trying to deal with that situation, he or she may not even know who the shooter really is,” Shibler said. “By the time they figure it out they could be killed.”

Click to expand...

DrTodd said:

Since this has happened to CPL holders countless times already, I think his fear is well founded. (Just imagine my post above is written in purple, denoting sarcasm. Tapatalk doesn't have, as far as I know, a method of changing text color)

Click to expand...

Bikenut said:

Please consider this as a reason there is so much resistance to teachers having guns in school...

The elitist leftists know and understand that the "Zero Tolerance" propaganda policy that is used to dominate, intimidate, and shame, kids who do or say anything... anything at all... that could be considered to have even the most remote connection to a dastardly GUN! cannot continue to be used to indoctrinate our kids to fear guns and to be trained to avoid anything and everything to do with guns while ingraining a deep aversion to guns by molding their minds to have an anti gun perspective and belief starting at pre school all the way up to graduation.....

....because....

the "Zero Tolerance" propaganda policy will not be effective if teachers, the role model kids spend 8 or more hours with everyday, start carrying guns in school.

Click to expand...

"State law enforcement, county law enforcement, local law enforcement -- every one of them have told me don't ever allow concealed weapons into the schools," Shibler said. "These are the professionals. They're the people you have to rely on, who know what the dangers are."

Click to expand...

EMNofSeattle said:

Really?????

Please, which officers are telling you that?

Doesn't Michigan law already allow CPL holders to open carry in a school?

Click to expand...

Raggs said:

for a city of under 6000 his income of $290,000 seems a bit high.

Click to expand...

Raggs said:

for a city of under 6000 his income of $290,000 seems a bit high.

Click to expand...

FreeInAZ said:

Nearly $50 ($48.33) per every man, woman & child.... it's good to be the king.

Click to expand...

Bikenut said:

Please consider this as a reason there is so much resistance to teachers having guns in school...

The elitist leftists know and understand that the "Zero Tolerance" propaganda policy that is used to dominate, intimidate, and shame, kids who do or say anything... anything at all... that could be considered to have even the most remote connection to a dastardly GUN! cannot continue to be used to indoctrinate our kids to fear guns and to be trained to avoid anything and everything to do with guns while ingraining a deep aversion to guns by molding their minds to have an anti gun perspective and belief starting at pre school all the way up to graduation.....

....because....

the "Zero Tolerance" propaganda policy will not be effective if teachers, the role model kids spend 8 or more hours with everyday, start carrying guns in school.

Click to expand...

EMNofSeattle said:

Really?????

Please, which officers are telling you that?

Doesn't Michigan law already allow CPL holders to open carry in a school?

Click to expand...

DrTodd said:

290,445 (income)/39,375 (population) = 7.37638095238 (see post above)

So, instead of "Nearly $50 ($48.33) per every man, woman & child" the amount is actually $7.38 for every man, woman, and child...

(With all of the concessions other employees have made I still think he makes a large amount of money, though)

Click to expand...

DrTodd said:

290,445 (income)/39,375 (population) = 7.37638095238 (see post above)

So, instead of "Nearly $50 ($48.33) per every man, woman & child" the amount is actually $7.38 for every man, woman, and child...

(With all of the concessions other employees have made I still think he makes a large amount of money, though)

Click to expand...