Way off topic
How is this OC related?
doesn't this violate rule 8?
and all those that attacked the OP and his defenders , violated rule #9 it seems. Because he was attacked because of the date he joined, the number of posts he has, the similarity to another's handle, and because he hadn't built up enough forum cred, to be believed.
I was under the impression, that the first rule of trolls, is not to feed them, if you doubted the post, you can ignore it, yet here we have 8 pages of
"I'm not going to believe it until..." vs. "it's true, I was there!"
Is this a sign of the degradation re the usefulness of the forum?
How is this OC related?
doesn't this violate rule 8?
and all those that attacked the OP and his defenders , violated rule #9 it seems. Because he was attacked because of the date he joined, the number of posts he has, the similarity to another's handle, and because he hadn't built up enough forum cred, to be believed.
I was under the impression, that the first rule of trolls, is not to feed them, if you doubted the post, you can ignore it, yet here we have 8 pages of
"I'm not going to believe it until..." vs. "it's true, I was there!"
Is this a sign of the degradation re the usefulness of the forum?