DOJ Memo: Outlaw and Confiscate All Guns

DOJ Memo: Outlaw and Confiscate All Guns

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com February 24, 2013
The National Rifle Association has obtained a Department of Justice memo calling for national gun registration and confiscation. The nine page “cursory summary” on current gun control initiatives was not officially released by the Obama administration.

The DOJ memo (downloadable here as a PDF) states the administration “believes that a gun ban will not work without mandatory gun confiscation,” according to the NRA, and thinks universal background checks “won’t work without requiring national gun registration.” Obama has yet to publicly support national registration or firearms confiscation, although the memo reveals his administration is moving in that direction.

The memo stands in stark contrast to the administration’s public stance on so-called gun control. White House spokesman Jay Carney said last month that laws proposed by Obama would not “take away a gun from a single law-abiding American.”

The NRA declined to explain how it obtained the document. The memo was written by the acting director of the Justice Department’s National Institute of Justice, Greg Ridgeway. It is dated January 4, two weeks before Obama mounted his attack on the Second Amendment following the Sandy Hook massacre. Ridgeway came to the Justice Department from the RAND corporation.

http://www.infowars.com/doj-memo-outlaw-and-confiscate-all-guns/

Folks, read the memo. It does give you insight into the Obama administrations intentions (despite denials by some here), but it is not as stark as portrayed.

The thing I found most interesting were non sequiturs like pointing that "assault weapons" are used for hardly any crime, so banning them would do no good, but then going on to discuss how to ban them anyway.

It's not a "What should we do?" document. It is more along the lines of "What can we get away with?"

Like most political magicians, Obama believes in the full use of misdirection and lots of "smoke and mirrors". Effemall! Pax....

eye95 said:

Folks, read the memo. It does give you insight into the Obama administrations intentions (despite denials by some here), but it is not as stark as portrayed.

The thing I found most interesting were non sequiturs like pointing that "assault weapons" are used for hardly any crime, so banning them would do no good, but then going on to discuss how to ban them anyway.

It's not a "What should we do?" document. It is more along the lines of "What can we get away with?"

Click to expand...

Plenty of records like this one ... more fuel for the fire !

katsung47 said:

.....The memo stands in stark contrast to the administration’s public stance on so-called gun control. White House spokesman Jay Carney said last month that laws proposed by Obama would not “take away a gun from a single law-abiding American.”.....

Click to expand...

How can we classify a citizen as a prohibited person......administratively. Mere wordsmithing by Obama, he cannot take away a gun from a LAC without due process.

Due process is the bulwark that prevents liberals from confiscating guns. Once your are classified as "unfit" to own a gun you are deprived of your rights. It happened to a citizen in California for a alleged "involuntary" stay in a hospital for a "mental" issue.

It is not about taking the guns, it is about making more LACs prohibited under current and proposed law.

Department of Veteran Affairs.

Corrents run deep in the Obama administration. Liberals will use the power of the bureaucracy to accomplish what the law would otherwise prohibit them from accomplishing