• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Not that it has anything to do with OC, but the NOVITES will like it

peter nap

Accomplished Advocate
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Messages
13,551
Location
Valhalla
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif] Dear Peter

Earlier today, Governor McDonnell signed my Concealed Carry Confidentiality bill (SB 1335) into law. Now that SB 1335 has been signed, law-abiding Virginians will no longer risk having their private information disclosed simply because they choose to exercise a constitutional right.
We all saw what happened when a New York newspaper published an interactive map of concealed carry permit-holders on their website: criminals used it to their advantage and law-abiding gun owners were harassed. But what’s even more disturbing is that these lists sometimes disclose the new addresses of victims of domestic violence and others who have a very good reason not to want their contact information in public view.
The problem wasn’t limited to New York. Prior to the enactment of Senate Bill 1335, a list of the names and addresses of concealed handgun permit holders is available for the asking from any clerks’ office.
In 2007, the Roanoke Times published a database containing the names and addresses of all concealed carry permit holders in Virginia, later pulled when they realized that they had inadvertently disclosed the new addresses of victims of domestic violence who owned firearms for their own protection.
Freedom of information is extremely important and transparency in government is essential. That’s why I’ve worked to open up the budget process to closer public scrutiny and, as a member of the Governor’s Commission on Government Reform and Restructuring, have supported proposals to open up government records and make the work of government more transparent. But having a concealed handgun permit shouldn’t land you on a public list.
With the enactment of this legislation, Virginia will join the majority of states in providing for the confidentiality of concealed handgun permit holders. The list will still be available to clerks’ offices, members of law enforcement, and other government officials entitled to access, but the list will no longer be subject to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests.
This isn’t a gun bill; it’s a public safety bill. That’s why I worked with the Virginia Court Clerks’ Association, and with clerks across the Commonwealth, on this important bill.
That New York newspaper treated law-abiding gun owners like criminals and, what’s worse, it put people in danger. That shouldn’t be allowed to happen here in Virginia – and with the enactment of this bill, it can’t anymore.

When Tim Kaine was Governor, he signed a bill sealing these records with the State Police, but that legislation did not address clerks’ offices, which also have copies of these records. Senate Bill 1335 closes that loophole, and I’m thankful to Governor McDonnell for signing this bill into law. His action is good news for all Virginians.

[/FONT][FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Best regards,
marksig_zc_v3_938000008853038_zc_v5_938000008853038.jpg

Mark Obenshain
[/FONT]
 

skidmark

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Jan 15, 2007
Messages
10,444
Location
Valhalla
The Clerk of the Circuit Court Loophole has been closed!

This will remove at least 12 gallons of blood per mile of street. It should also reduce the incidence of horses fainting by 37% and of women stampeding by 2.7%.

Now, if we could somehow get those guns off the streets. They ding up the rocker panels something fierce when I drive over them.

stay safe.
 

TFred

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
7,750
Location
Most historic town in, Virginia, USA
Just yesterday I sent the Governor a message via his website urging him to sign the bill. I'm sure that's why he did it today! Ha ha ha ha!

On a serious note, thanks for the update. I have been watching the LIS for the status, (which still has not yet been updated to reflect his signature!)

When I first returned to the interests of gun ownership in the summer of 2008, I was quickly reminded of this horrible breach of privacy. That was when many local newspapers were routinely publishing monthly lists of "who got their CHP this month," including full names and addresses, and of course the famous Roanoke Times fiasco, putting the entire database on-line.

I guess I'll have to decide what is my new "number one priority" for pro-gun legislation now.

And one of these days, I just might decide to go ahead and get a Virginia CHP! :)

TFred
 

Marco

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2007
Messages
3,905
Location
Greene County
This isn’t a gun bill; it’s a public safety bill. That’s why I worked with the Virginia Court Clerks’ Association, and with clerks across the Commonwealth, on this important bill.

I got the same email, except mine was addressed to me (I know some smart arse would've had a comment).

So, if it was a gun bill he would have ????
I couldn't care less as I don't have a VA chp but I do think it is stupid to have the chp info as public info
for anyone to see.


Now, if we could just get an elected offical to push constitutional carry.
So far, most seem to lack the spine to introduce and push one.
 
Last edited:

peter nap

Accomplished Advocate
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Messages
13,551
Location
Valhalla
Now, if we could just get an elected offical to push constitutional carry.
So far, most seem to lack the spine to introduce and push one.

Yep!
That would solve diluting the transparency laws and P4P.
Soon maybe!
 

Marco

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2007
Messages
3,905
Location
Greene County
I don't think the P4P's will ever disappear, they MIGHT get diluted. Like tax money once folks get a taste for things they have a hard time giving them up.
IMHO, many chp'ers would have a hard time giving up there special status (we have been vetted/ good guy creds etc...) and then there's the reciprocity thing.


Also, I would hate to get Constitutional carry with stupid restrictions like no carry w/ ABC on (like AZ) unless you have a permit or no carry at all in ABC on/off for non permit holder like NM. Or one must notify LE if lawfully stopped by LE like AK.
(^^^^^ iirc on all accounts as I can't look up and cite now)

I'm all for the transparency of Gov't laws but imho having CHP info available for all to see was just a bully tactic by the Gov't to keep some folks from wanting to get their permit.
 
Last edited:

TFred

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
7,750
Location
Most historic town in, Virginia, USA
I'm all for the transparency of Gov't laws but imho having CHP info available for all to see was just a bully tactic by the Gov't to keep some folks from wanting to get their permit.
I would disagree slightly. IMHO, I would fully agree that it was a bully tactic against possible CHP holders, but a tactic run by the gun grabbers, including the media, not necessarily "the government". There were and always will be a few legislators who will always support public access to CHP information, but they fall squarely into that "gun-grabber" category.

I have followed this issue very closely for the past 5 years, and each year prior to this, it died in a lopsided Senate subcommittee and that was very much on purpose. I believe both sides knew full well that if it ever got to the full Senate it would pass (as it did QUITE easily this year, even though the senate is evenly divided 20-20, it passed 31-9.)

It may not always be the case, but for this issue, I believe the will of the people was finally carried out, by stopping the few gun-grabbing Senators who have thwarted the will of the people on this issue for the past five years.

TFred
 

skidmark

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Jan 15, 2007
Messages
10,444
Location
Valhalla
Susan Stimpson is for it.

Will she carry a bill for us?

Being "for" something is one thing. Doing something to try to make it a reality is another. AKA "I support the Second Amendment."

stay safe.
 

TFred

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
7,750
Location
Most historic town in, Virginia, USA
Will she carry a bill for us?

Being "for" something is one thing. Doing something to try to make it a reality is another. AKA "I support the Second Amendment."

stay safe.
She's running for Lt. Governor. I don't think she will be able to carry a bill from that office. But hopefully she will keep the Democratic Senators in line.

TFred
 

Marco

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2007
Messages
3,905
Location
Greene County
I would disagree slightly. IMHO, I would fully agree that it was a bully tactic against possible CHP holders, but a tactic run by the gun grabbers, including the media, not necessarily "the government". There were and always will be a few legislators who will always support public access to CHP information, but they fall squarely into that "gun-grabber" category.

I have followed this issue very closely for the past 5 years, and each year prior to this, it died in a lopsided Senate subcommittee and that was very much on purpose. I believe both sides knew full well that if it ever got to the full Senate it would pass (as it did QUITE easily this year, even though the senate is evenly divided 20-20, it passed 31-9.)

It may not always be the case, but for this issue, I believe the will of the people was finally carried out, by stopping the few gun-grabbing Senators who have thwarted the will of the people on this issue for the past five years.

TFred

Feel free to disagree as much as you like. The elected officals included and failed to remove the bullying tactic. They also failed to enforce the rules that would have prevented the death starr committes.
They are the Gov't and many are anti, most are neutral and VERY few are pro/our freinds. They had a choice when the law was adopted and every yr since.

Like I said earlier" the change doesn't effect me" but I view it as the Gov't bullying citizens.
 
Last edited:

Defrock

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2013
Messages
98
Location
Nokesville, VA
FWIW, I met Susan Stimpson in Manassas at Chik-fil-a while OC'ing. I don't think she noticed, and she was uninformed that storing a firearm out of view anywhere in a vehicle was NOT considered 'concealed carry' and didn't require a permit. She was impressed with my knowledge of VA gun law and I owe that to all of you. She affirmed to me that she would not support any bill that tried to restrict gun ownership in Virginia. She also affirmed that she would have supported the Bonita Bill when it passed through the GA. My wife spoke to her as well about taxes, schools, and kids and she came away liking Susan. But, that's what politicians do, isn't it?

In any case, I neglected to turn in my form on time so I won't be at the State Convention this year. The only person I DON'T want to win the convention is Corey Stewart.
 

Defrock

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2013
Messages
98
Location
Nokesville, VA
What? I don't think you have this right.

There is a requirement for a "secured container." That's a lot different than "stored out of view."

TFred

You're right, I was simply lazy in my wording. I meant to say glove box and closed center console are not concealed storage. Hidden under a seat would be. Susan did believe that storing in a glove box would require a CHP.
 

mpguy

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2012
Messages
689
Location
Suffolk Virginia
Will she carry a bill for us?

Being "for" something is one thing. Doing something to try to make it a reality is another. AKA "I support the Second Amendment."

stay safe.

I'd rather have the civil liability removed, when found innocent of a justifiable shooting. Constitutional carry is great, though and I would take either.

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2
 
Last edited:
Top