Liberal claptrap. Even Thomas Jefferson did not advocate for absolute liberty.It's an appealing philosophy, I suppose, that is, if you accept the Principle: Self-ownership. I understand why individuals cling to it: Control.--individuals want to believe, and feel as though they have as much control as possible.
For good or ill, humans are social creatures, and by that, do not have absolute Liberty, basically, none of us have sole ownership over our selves.
Man is not even born with Liberty, Man is born as the social creature that he is; absent Liberty...at best, having a degree of Liberty. Liberty is not Absolute.
Peace out.
It's an appealing philosophy, I suppose, that is, if you accept the Principle: Self-ownership. I understand why individuals cling to it: Control.--individuals want to believe, and feel as though they have as much control as possible.
For good or ill, humans are social creatures, and by that, do not have absolute Liberty, basically, none of us have sole ownership over our selves.
Man is not even born with Liberty, Man is born as the social creature that he is; absent Liberty...at best, having a degree of Liberty. Liberty is not Absolute.
Peace out.
I enjoy a lot of things that I hope you would enjoy. I know you won't enjoy them all, so I would always provide an indication of what the thing was in order that you would better be able to judge if you'd like to try it.
Can you provide a summary? I'd hate to click the link to find that someone is demonstrating their philosophy of Liberty by graphically demonstrating their right to pierce parts of their body that I don't even want to see when they aren't pierced.
...EYE just watch the video. then you can except [sic] or reject it
i call BS. you are born alone and you die alone. nothing is writing in stone. watch the video. it is what we have and how much we are willing to give to others, with or without force
EYE just watch the video. then you can except or reject it
Liberal claptrap. Even Thomas Jefferson did not advocate for absolute liberty.
But he did advocate for as much liberty as any citizen desired to exercise free of government interference. You, on the other hand, seek to encumber the citizenry with government and then have the citizenry petition the government to issue some number of liberties for the exercising.
Then I agree...Liberty is not Absolute...it is a matter of degrees. I'm glad we could come to this agreement...you, me, and Jefferson.
So, Liberty is acquired by desire, I suppose by action? One must, if they want more Liberty, take action to gain it? I agree. But I digress, man is a social creature, and his Liberty is intertwined with all of individuals in his society. A man's Liberty is dependent on the Liberty of all men.
I'm really digging this philosophy thing.