Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: BW3 refuses to serve armed officers... sort of

  1. #1
    Regular Member MKEgal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    in front of my computer, WI
    Posts
    4,426

    BW3 refuses to serve armed officers... sort of

    .

  2. #2
    Regular Member MKEgal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    in front of my computer, WI
    Posts
    4,426
    The clerk applied the company anti-gun policy.
    The officers didn't like it, didn't want to leave their guns in their cars like any other customer.
    A stink was raised, letters were written, the manager apologized.
    Applying it unfairly is even worse than having the policy in the first place.
    http://manassas.patch.com/articles/p...ecause-of-guns

    (And maybe they didn't know BW3 was anti-rights... why would they want to give money to a company with such a policy?)

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    , ,
    Posts
    240

    Re: BW3 refuses to serve armed officers... sort of

    Agreed MKEgal. Policy should be policy. Being a LEO should not also make you a Citizen+.

    Carthago Delenda Est

  4. #4
    Regular Member Beretta92FSLady's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    In My Coffee
    Posts
    5,278
    It's this type of ridiculousness that's going to backfire on the pro-firearm community. Mark my words. It looks great on paper, and it's certainly a stick in the eye of the State, but there is zero ground gained in the pro-firearm community.
    I don't mind watching the OC-Community (tea party 2.0's, who have hijacked the OC-Community) cannibalize itself. I do mind watching OC dragged through the gutter. OC is an exercise of A Right. I choose to not OC; I choose to not own firearms. I choose to leave the OC-Community to it's own self-inflicted injuries, and eventual implosion. Carry on...

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Richmond, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    1,171

    You should know by now,

    Quote Originally Posted by kurt555gs View Post
    Agreed MKEgal. Policy should be policy. Being a LEO should not also make you a Citizen+.

    Carthago Delenda Est
    The "Golden Children" think the laws don't apply to them. Same goes for private company policies, they don't apply to them.

    Like Senators and Representatives, the laws are only for the "common man" not the privileged!

  6. #6
    Regular Member CDT COX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    281
    Still not sure why people call it "bw3". Last I checked, Buffalo Wild Wings hasn't had 3 W's since the last century.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •