Agreed :lol: I have already had the talk with my lady friend about this. I will not comply with any new laws
Anyone who votes for a law that contains what any reasonable person should know is violation of our bill of rights is guilty of treason and should be afforded the treatment that traitors historically have received.
I strongly agree with the part about jurors. we need to spread the word about jurors' responsibilities to refuse to convict anyone under the new law
Yup! We actually do have the final word. I'm actually considering a flier campaign to support just that point.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2
only problem is all the stuck up snobby yuppies in our state that will aggressively attempt the opposite. and we all know how court systems pick and choose the jurors
I strongly agree with the part about jurors. we need to spread the word about jurors' responsibilities to refuse to convict anyone under the new law
This site has some very useful information on the subject of Fully Informed Jurors http://fija.org/ and voting to acquit based on improper or unjust laws.
I've been a lurker here for over a week. I strongly agree with your post and had to register on the site to voice my opinion. I agree with everything said by the OP. If we don't stick together now, we will always regret not fighting back against the unconstitutional "laws" placed on law abiding Citizens of this state. I truly believe that these 'laws' will be overturned as the SCOTUS has ruled that you CAN NOT ban firearms AND magazines that are in common use and that's exactly what our so called legislators have done. Also, I feel that this whole process was simply to get more revenue and does nothing for public safety!! All it will do is hurt people who follow the letter of the law and only wish to protect their loved ones. This whole episode makes me sick and we can only hope others will see this too for what it is and NOT convict people for simply having something that's perfectly legal to own, WITHOUT unconstitutional "restrictions". Carry on!!
There is, I should point out, NO REQUIREMENT for the supreme court to ever hear cases to straighten this out. From 1939 through 2008 I don't think that there were ANY cases SCOTUS took up...Heller was a smart case as the issue of "incorporation" was moot to the case and they took on McDonald ... if they'll take up Heller II and other cases is not a given.
We could have another 70 yr (or forever) drought ... so we may effectively end up with the east coast having no gun rights and other parts having gun rights and other parts being in the middle. And Scalia is not that great a supporter of 2nd amendment rights IMO so I don't know if I want a Scalia current court hearing any of this...it would be a crap shoot IMO.
So looking at alternatives -- always a positive thing to do
Dave, I understand that there isn't a requirement to hear any particular case. But one would think they'll look at any challenge to the blatantly unconstitutional law just passed here, and in fact NY. But one thing is certain, I hope they look at these BEFORE we loose one of the (so called) conservative Justices because if they wait, and Obama appoints another far left loon to the court, well we're done.
Welcome aboard, CT Patriot! I, like David McBeth, place no faith in the Roberts court, or any court for that matter..