• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Rick Warren Says Late Son Got Illegal Gun on Internet

eye95

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
13,524
Location
Fairborn, Ohio, USA
You are exactly right. The media is spinning this and its so disgusting. They are using this as an example of why we need MORE gun regulation.

The stupid nut job kid broke like 10 different laws. The seller broke 10 different laws.

IMO this is a perfect example of why laws DONT WORK and why we shouldnt pass more laws to infringe on innocent citizens.

That he only broke ten laws is the problem. If an action does not violate at least twelve laws, the legislators haven't done their jobs and earned their pay. We need more laws. That is the only way to stop criminals from breaking them. Even they have their standards. They'll break ten, but not twelve. More laws, dammit!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk.

<o>
 

davidmcbeth

Banned
Joined
Jan 14, 2012
Messages
16,167
Location
earth's crust
PARTIAL QUOTE REMOVED BY ADMINISTRATOR: Partially quoting changes the posters meaning.

The the guy should be charged and tried for his crimes ... dig him up! In actuality, he committed no crimes .. innocent until proven guilty...so they have to dig him up
 
Last edited by a moderator:

eye95

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
13,524
Location
Fairborn, Ohio, USA
I usually don't bother to respond to what you post. I don't find it worthy of my time.

While that is still true of your above post, I must point out that the dishonest way in which you edited my post (and failed to indicate that you did so) changed its meaning. Reading my whole post reveals (to even those of modest intelligence) that I am being sarcastic. By quoting only a portion, you removed the sarcastic tone.

Honesty demands that, if you only partially quote another, you indicate that you did so and that you strive to maintain the original meaning. Even though I never expect honesty from you, I still demand it when it comes to quoting my words.
 
Top