He doesn't waste time :banghead:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...on-on-guns-after-senate-vote/?test=latestnews
Mike
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...on-on-guns-after-senate-vote/?test=latestnews
Mike
-
We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
-
If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
-
Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.
Obama taking executive action on guns after Senate vote
- Thread starter ps1mhd
- Start date
eye95
Well-known member
The main thrust seems to be getting States to provide more information about who is being adjudicated as mentally ill. They are looking for ways around HIPPA.
I have a concern: Records that someone has been adjudicated as mentally ill should not be medical records protected under HIPPA. A doctor's individual judgment that his patient is mentally ill is. I have no problem with the former being reportable (as long as due process was followed, including competent representation for the "accused"). The latter, however, is private information that is no one's business until and unless there has been a proceeding for the former, in which case the privacy may be broken, if need be in the eyes of the court, by that court.
No one should be deprived of life, Liberty, or property without due process of law. Removal of the RKBA without a lawful hearing in which the "accused" is properly represented and can face his accusers would be a denial of Liberty (and likely property also) without due process of law.
I have a concern: Records that someone has been adjudicated as mentally ill should not be medical records protected under HIPPA. A doctor's individual judgment that his patient is mentally ill is. I have no problem with the former being reportable (as long as due process was followed, including competent representation for the "accused"). The latter, however, is private information that is no one's business until and unless there has been a proceeding for the former, in which case the privacy may be broken, if need be in the eyes of the court, by that court.
No one should be deprived of life, Liberty, or property without due process of law. Removal of the RKBA without a lawful hearing in which the "accused" is properly represented and can face his accusers would be a denial of Liberty (and likely property also) without due process of law.
papa bear
Regular Member
Agreed EYE. that is one of the foundations for our nation, is "due process"