OC4me
Regular Member
Lawyer, getting back on topic, what do you think of the Norman opinion? This summary is interesing:
"While the right to carry outside the home has been established by the highest court of the land, no decision interpreting the Second Amendment can be cited for the proposition that a state must allow for one form of carry over another. Because the Legislature has the right to enact laws regarding the manner in which arms can be borne, it is likewise permitted to forbid the carrying of arms in a particular place or manner which, in its collective judgment, is likely to lead to breaches of the peace, see Carlton v. State, 58 So. 486, 488-89 (Fla. 1912), provided a reasonable alternative manner of carry is provided."
"...no decision interpreting the Second Amendment can be cited for the proposition that a state must allow for one form of carry over another". Isn't this false on its face? The supreme court cited SC cases from Georgia, Alabama, and Louisiana that said OC could not be banned. We also have a recent federal court case from Colorado that says OC is a right.
Bingo!