Results 1 to 22 of 22

Thread: We will not be intimidated...

  1. #1
    Regular Member Tucker6900's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Iowa, USA
    Posts
    1,249

    We will not be intimidated...

    Adam Kokesh to march on Washington....Open Carry

    Mods and Owners:
    I ask that you allow this post to stay, even though it may fall outside of the LGOC rule. This has the potential to be historic news, and affects us all.
    Last edited by Tucker6900; 05-06-2013 at 02:35 PM.
    The only terrorists I see nowadays are at the Capital.


    The statements made in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of OCDO or its members.

  2. #2
    Regular Member acmariner99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Renton, Wa
    Posts
    662
    I would like to see OCDO keep their distance from this event - people are free to choose individually of course - but lets bear in mind that what this guy is advocating is completely illegal (Loaded OC in the District of Columbia) and it is against OCDO policy to advocate activity that is against the law. This has the potential to backfire very very badly. Officially I cannot condone what these people are doing, nor do I believe we are at a point where we have the numbers where an act of civil disobedience such as this would gain any significant traction.

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    484
    I, for one, would consider them Patriots. If it wasn't for breaking laws we would still be under England's rule. Furthermore, unconstitutional laws, are not laws, but tyranny.

  4. #4
    Regular Member PFC HALE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    earth
    Posts
    492

    We will not be intimidated...

    Quote Originally Posted by acmariner99 View Post
    I would like to see OCDO keep their distance from this event - people are free to choose individually of course - but lets bear in mind that what this guy is advocating is completely illegal (Loaded OC in the District of Columbia) and it is against OCDO policy to advocate activity that is against the law. This has the potential to backfire very very badly. Officially I cannot condone what these people are doing, nor do I believe we are at a point where we have the numbers where an act of civil disobedience such as this would gain any significant traction.
    you miss the point of this. by banning the right to keep and bare arms in any manner is unconstitutional, regardless of a law, this is why thy are doing it. yes it might be "illegal" but it is a right to us per the constitution.

    i say DO IT!!!
    HOPE FOR THE BEST, EXPECT THE WORST, PREPARE FOR WAR

  5. #5
    Accomplished Advocate BB62's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
    Posts
    3,887
    Quote Originally Posted by PFC HALE View Post
    you miss the point of this. by banning the right to keep and bare arms in any manner is unconstitutional, regardless of a law, this is why thy are doing it...
    "Bare" arms? LOL Ever heard of the right to BEAR arms?

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Slidell, Louisiana
    Posts
    2,464
    Quote Originally Posted by acmariner99 View Post
    I would like to see OCDO keep their distance from this event - people are free to choose individually of course - but lets bear in mind that what this guy is advocating is completely illegal (Loaded OC in the District of Columbia) and it is against OCDO policy to advocate activity that is against the law. This has the potential to backfire very very badly. Officially I cannot condone what these people are doing, nor do I believe we are at a point where we have the numbers where an act of civil disobedience such as this would gain any significant traction.
    It seems to me the OP is simply asking that the thread stand as an awarness. I don't think he's suggesting OCDO get behind this movement. We make each other aware of things all the time here but, that doesn't mean OCDO advocates it all.

    I certainly wouldn't want to see OCDO advocate for this event, but I do hope the mods allow us to discuss it as it unfolds.

  7. #7
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Slidell, Louisiana
    Posts
    2,464
    Quote Originally Posted by BB62 View Post
    "Bare" arms? LOL Ever heard of the right to BEAR arms?
    You miss the point... it'll be summertime soon and he may have to wear a tank top so his arms are bare while he bears his arms.
    Last edited by georg jetson; 05-06-2013 at 05:42 PM.

  8. #8
    Regular Member Tucker6900's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Iowa, USA
    Posts
    1,249
    Quote Originally Posted by georg jetson View Post
    It seems to me the OP is simply asking that the thread stand as an awarness. I don't think he's suggesting OCDO get behind this movement. We make each other aware of things all the time here but, that doesn't mean OCDO advocates it all.

    I certainly wouldn't want to see OCDO advocate for this event, but I do hope the mods allow us to discuss it as it unfolds.
    That is exactly the point of the post. However, the discussion of the matter, without crossing the LGOC line, is possible. As stated earlier, carry in DC is illegal, per unconstitutional state law, and that includes the carry of pistols.

    I am eager to see the outcome of this. Updated articles show Mr. Kokesh is working with DC police to plan the event and make them aware of what is going to happen. This will definately be interesting.
    Last edited by Tucker6900; 05-06-2013 at 05:50 PM.
    The only terrorists I see nowadays are at the Capital.


    The statements made in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of OCDO or its members.

  9. #9
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    484
    Quote Originally Posted by georg jetson View Post
    It seems to me the OP is simply asking that the thread stand as an awarness. I don't think he's suggesting OCDO get behind this movement. We make each other aware of things all the time here but, that doesn't mean OCDO advocates it all.

    I certainly wouldn't want to see OCDO advocate for this event, but I do hope the mods allow us to discuss it as it unfolds.
    Don't know why one wouldn't hope that a 2nd amendment forum wouldn't advocate and congratulate those willing to stand up for our constitution and against a tyrannical government.

  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Fairborn, Ohio, USA
    Posts
    13,063

    We will not be intimidated...

    Quote Originally Posted by ADobbs1989 View Post
    I, for one, would consider them Patriots. If it wasn't for breaking laws we would still be under England's rule. Furthermore, unconstitutional laws, are not laws, but tyranny.
    Advocate and praise the advocacy of breaking the law all that you wish. You just should not do so here, as this is private property and the owners have expressed the absolute ban on such advocacy.

    This thread should be taken down!


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk.

    <o>

  11. #11
    Regular Member Tucker6900's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Iowa, USA
    Posts
    1,249
    Quote Originally Posted by eye95 View Post
    Advocate and praise the advocacy of breaking the law all that you wish. You just should not do so here, as this is private property and the owners have expressed the absolute ban on such advocacy.

    This thread should be taken down!


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk.

    <o>
    Easy there hoss. Noone but Mr. Kokesh and his group are publicly advocating anything. Dobbs simply stated a factual opinion on the matter at hand. And if calling someone a patriot for doing something that is patriotic is against the rules, so be it. Its not your decision to make. So, I suggest you quit derailing threads because you are offended by its content.
    The only terrorists I see nowadays are at the Capital.


    The statements made in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of OCDO or its members.

  12. #12
    Regular Member Tucker6900's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Iowa, USA
    Posts
    1,249
    Quote Originally Posted by ADobbs1989 View Post
    Don't know why one wouldn't hope that a 2nd amendment forum wouldn't advocate and congratulate those willing to stand up for our constitution and against a tyrannical government.
    I sturggle with that question quite a bit, but as it is their site, its their rules.

    Now, unless this gets out of hand with "patriotic" talk, I request that the thread stay for informational amd discussion(within the rules) purposes.
    The only terrorists I see nowadays are at the Capital.


    The statements made in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of OCDO or its members.

  13. #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Fairborn, Ohio, USA
    Posts
    13,063
    Quote Originally Posted by Tucker6900 View Post
    Easy there hoss. Noone but Mr. Kokesh and his group are publicly advocating anything. Dobbs simply stated a factual opinion on the matter at hand. And if calling someone a patriot for doing something that is patriotic is against the rules, so be it. Its not your decision to make. So, I suggest you quit derailing threads because you are offended by its content.
    Easy there, Little Joe. No one was "offended" by the thread. It is a clear rules violation on two counts. It is about LGOC, and it advocates, through advertising, breaking the law.

  14. #14
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    484
    Quote Originally Posted by eye95 View Post
    Easy there, Little Joe. No one was "offended" by the thread. It is a clear rules violation on two counts. It is about LGOC, and it advocates, through advertising, breaking the law.
    Can't be a law if it's in direct violation of the Constitution.

  15. #15
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Fairborn, Ohio, USA
    Posts
    13,063
    Quote Originally Posted by ADobbs1989 View Post
    Can't be a law if it's in direct violation of the Constitution.
    And the owners have stated on many occasions that they do not allow the advocacy of breaking unconstitutional laws. It is their site. They will make the ultimate call. However, if they are being consistent, they will shut this thread down.

  16. #16
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    484
    Quote Originally Posted by eye95 View Post
    And the owners have stated on many occasions that they do not allow the advocacy of breaking unconstitutional laws. It is their site. They will make the ultimate call. However, if they are being consistent, they will shut this thread down.
    Luckily there are people out there who support patriots and those who will stand against tyranny as our founders did so long ago. I guess it's just too bad the owners of this website aren't within that group.

  17. #17
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Slidell, Louisiana
    Posts
    2,464
    Quote Originally Posted by eye95 View Post
    Easy there, Little Joe. No one was "offended" by the thread. It is a clear rules violation on two counts. It is about LGOC, and it advocates, through advertising, breaking the law.
    Negative. The OP is not attempting to advocate for the carry of Long Guns. It is an observance of another organization's activism.

    Further, I don't see the OP rallying OCDO members to follow suit. It is not illegal to monitor and discuss the public actions of others.

  18. #18
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Slidell, Louisiana
    Posts
    2,464
    Hey, maybe this thread will stand cause the other one posted days earlier hasn't been messed with either.

    http://forum.opencarry.org/forums/sh...ton-07-04-2013

  19. #19
    Regular Member PFC HALE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    earth
    Posts
    492

    We will not be intimidated...

    Quote Originally Posted by BB62 View Post
    "Bare" arms? LOL Ever heard of the right to BEAR arms?
    my apologies mr grammatical nazi, i was half asleep when i typed it. thank you for the correction i will ensure not to make another that would hurt your feeling.
    HOPE FOR THE BEST, EXPECT THE WORST, PREPARE FOR WAR

  20. #20
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Fairborn, Ohio, USA
    Posts
    13,063
    Quote Originally Posted by PFC HALE View Post
    my apologies mr grammatical nazi, i was half asleep when i typed it. thank you for the correction i will ensure not to make another that would hurt your feeling.
    He only has one feeling to hurt??? Sorry...couldn't resist.

  21. #21
    Regular Member PFC HALE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    earth
    Posts
    492

    We will not be intimidated...

    lmao!
    HOPE FOR THE BEST, EXPECT THE WORST, PREPARE FOR WAR

  22. #22
    Moderator / Administrator Grapeshot's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    North Chesterfield, Va.
    Posts
    34,627
    There were already 2 threads on this very topic - now merged and moved to the General Discussion sub-forum = the only one remotely appropriate. The is no need for more than one thread to follow this event - therefore locking this one and any new ones.

    Posting about someone else's intention to break the law or not follow forum rules is not sufficently different than advocating/promoting the same, especially in light of what has been seen here.
    Last edited by Grapeshot; 05-07-2013 at 07:16 PM.
    You will not rise to the occasion; you will fall back on your level of training. Archilochus, 650 BC

    Old and treacherous will beat young and skilled every time. Yata hey.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •