The article starts off stating that the story might be bogus! What kind of reporting is that??? Moreover, the word is highlighted as a link which takes you to a search of something completely different. This examiner is either a complete boob or is intentionally being unprofessional.
We have several members here who are examiners. I suggest that they explore any unprofessionalism in this article and take corrective action against the author for any that they find. If not, they risk all the examiners' credibility.
I stopped reading the article after clicking the link. If I hear of this from a more credible source (examiner.com is usually highly reliable), I will take it seriously. Otherwise, IMO, this is total Bravo Sierra (that knocks down examiner.com credibility a notch).