I wonder how to react to this.
If my city did it, I'd be opposed to the foolish waste of tax dollars that they take from me.
If another city does it, I laugh at their foolishness and consider being nearby to see if I can benefit from the fallout.
If a private company supports such governmental idiocy, are they being anti-gun, or just stupid? Surely their "generosity" won't come off the actual bottom-line. This cost will be factored into cost analyses and will simply be passed along as modest price increases. I guess that I should object to that. However, if they still have the best price on an item that I need, I will purchase it from them, even if that best price could have been a tad better.
For the moment, I am going with Amazon being stupid and not anti-gun. However, they have made the watch-list.