Why is this cop making argument? He cannot act as consul per CGS Sec. 51-88 (?)
This case is a good example of why cop's cannot and should not be able to argue.
(b) The local authority shall take the fingerprints of such applicant or conduct any other method of positive identification required by the State Police Bureau of Identification or the Federal Bureau of Investigation, unless the local authority determines that the fingerprints of such applicant have been previously taken and the applicant’s identity established, and such applicant presents identification that the local authority verifies as valid. The local authority shall record the date the fingerprints were taken in the applicant’s file and, within five business days of such date, shall forward such fingerprints or other positive identifying information to the State Police Bureau of Identification which shall conduct criminal history records checks in accordance with section 29-17a.
And why is the board asking a bunch of questions .... they cannot once the hearing begins .. no where does the law allows them to ask questions during the active hearing ...
(c) Any person aggrieved by the action of an issuing authority may file with the board a clear and concise statement of the facts on which he relies for relief, and shall state the relief sought by the appellant. The receipt by the board of the appellant’s statement shall initiate the appeals process, and no appeal may be rejected for mere lack of formality. The board shall, within ten days next following receipt of the appeal, set a time and place at which the appeal shall be heard. The board, while such appeal is pending, may request such additional information from the appellant and from the issuing authority as it deems reasonably necessary to conduct a fair and impartial hearing, and shall require of the issuing authority from whose decision or action the appeal is being sought a statement in writing setting forth the reasons for such failure, refusal, revocation or limitation. Failure or refusal of the issuing authority to furnish such written statement, or to supply the appellant with an application, at least ten days prior to the hearing shall be cause for the board to grant the relief sought, forthwith and without further hearing.
Why did the board start examining convictions on the state website? Asking for captian's mast and other questions? Ridiculous questions...irrelevant and under Chapter 54 they are to prevent irrelevant queries -- they are supposed to prevent such queries (but yet go on and on violating Chapter 54 again and again) ... it is up to the issuing authority to prove that he has not met the requirements regarding disqualifies ..
The BFPE should be eliminated .... this case audio examples why: they allow cops to represent towns illegally, they cannot contain themselves to the limits that the legislature has made upon them ...