• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Wa cpl

Freedom1Man

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2012
Messages
4,462
Location
Greater Eastside Washington
I would encourage non-CPL holders to not rely on 9.41.060(8) unless they are actually engaged in the outdoor activities facially contemplated by the statute. Even an only moderately aggressive LEO may find the conduct pretextual and issue a citation. Likely due to the current political climate, I have been seeing a trend where prosecutors are charging virtually all alleged violations of firearms laws, even when the case is weak. So, even if you do win (you can never predict what the 12-headed monster or the specter-in-black will do), it can take well over a year to get the firearm back.

12 in a court of record and 6 in a court not of record.
 
Top