Not without a warrant, and I am not sure on the statute's number, but we do have KRS that protects our rights during a state of emergency. Of course if you have a HAZMAT spill or leak or situation near your home, I seriously doubt you'll want to stick around long enough to see if they'll drag you out of your own home. But then again, You are free to stay and tell us how long it takes for your skin to melt, I'll wait eagerly,
What about those Level 3 snow emergencies where they tell you can't travel unless it is an emergency? Is that really legal?
http://www.lrc.ky.gov/krs/039a00/100.pdf
Read 39A.100, sections 1(f) and 2(b) very carefully. You can be declared such a person and, as the statute says, forcibly removed to a place of safety.
The nice part is that they cannot take your guns and ammo. BUT - I'll bet the shelters have "no firearms" policies. They will if operated by the Red Cross. For quite some time now the Salvation Army has been cut out of the sheltering business due to a federal "agreement" with ARC. The one SA homeless shelter where I did volunteer work had no problems with me OCing while there.
stay safe.
http://www.lrc.ky.gov/krs/039a00/100.pdf
Read 39A.100, sections 1(f) and 2(b) very carefully. You can be declared such a person and, as the statute says, forcibly removed to a place of safety.
The nice part is that they cannot take your guns and ammo. BUT - I'll bet the shelters have "no firearms" policies. They will if operated by the Red Cross. For quite some time now the Salvation Army has been cut out of the sheltering business due to a federal "agreement" with ARC. The one SA homeless shelter where I did volunteer work had no problems with me OCing while there.
stay safe.
Really? Going to shoot at people in a bona fide emergency that are trying to do their jobs and get people to safety? If its a made up emergency, I get it. Otherwise, I think that's a pretty hardline stance.
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
Don't lecture me about backbone, son. And I'm not from Louisville. Posting about slaughtering first responders trying to help people doesn't advance our cause and is immature spouting off. Stay in your home and die. No one cares.
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
I currently live in Louisville, I'm not from Louisville.
And I wasn't trash talking. Maybe I missed one of the primary reasons for this forum, but I thought it was to educate and bring firearms back into the norm in an anthropological way through our behavior with them. People come here to get information and learn about what open carry is all about. Reading this chain, they are going to think its a bunch of gun nut zealots that kill firemen and police officers trying to evacuate people from the homes in a crisis. Is that really the image we want to show people? Does that really advance our cause? If I'm mistaken, then rock on.
And the backbone comment wasn't necessary. I'm making a point and it isn't necessary to be personal just because you don't like it.
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2
Really? Going to shoot at people in a bona fide emergency that are trying to do their jobs and get people to safety? If its a made up emergency, I get it. Otherwise, I think that's a pretty hardline stance.
Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2