Few open carry questions to clear things up for me

Raggs said:

I think it would be more a employee - employer type relationship

Click to expand...

The school would have to argue in court that the 123.1103 exemption for employee regulation applies to Students because students are employees of the school. And that would not fly in court, considering the STUDENTS are paying the SCHOOL, not the other way around.

It definitely feels like that sort of relationship, but if the City of Royal Oak cannot enter into contract with ABE and have ABE prohibit firearms, then the school cannot enter into contract with STUDENTS and, in part of that contract, prohibit firearms.

zigziggityzoo said:

It definitely feels like that sort of relationship, but if the City of Royal Oak cannot enter into contract with ABE and have ABE prohibit firearms, then the school cannot enter into contract with STUDENTS and, in part of that contract, prohibit firearms.

Click to expand...

That's a big if. ABE was never litigated. Such a case would certainly end up at CoA.