Another Judge get's it WRONG "THE NEWTOWN EFFECT"

KEEP IN MIND THAT THERE ARE POLICE REPORTS WHICH DOCUMENT THE FACT(s) THAT
NO FIREARM WAS USED IN THIS EVENT.

I have met the husband and wife, read the police reports and other doucments.

Something judges should do before they open their mouths on the record.

DOG REPEATEDLY LEAVES ANAL DROPPINGS ON LAWN OF ANOHTER
REPEATED UNSUCCESSFUL ATTEMPTS TO HAVE INDIVIDUAL WALKING DOG PREVENT SAME.
HUSBAND OF FIREARM OWNER IS ARRESTED FOR THEATENING THE DOG.
HUSBAND ARRESTED DOES NOT OWN ANY FIREARMS.
WIFES (WHO DID NOTHING) HAS HER FIREARMS SEIZED.

JUDGE INCORRECTLY BELIEVES FIREARM USED DURING CONFRONTATION.

"THE NEWTOWN EFFECT"



MAY 30, 2013

BEFORE THE HONORABLE ROBERT BRUNETTI , JUDGE

A P PEA RAN C E S
Representing the State of Connecticut: ATTORNEY RONALD DEARSTYNERepresenting the Defendant : ATTORNEY AARON JAINCHILL

Also Appearing: ATTORNEY RACHEL BAIRDMR. DEARSTYNE: Pre-trial docket , line 6, David
Stacey.

MR. JAINCHLL: Good morning, Your Honor , Aaron
Jainchill for Mr. Stacey. As we discussed in
chambers, my client has rejected the offer.

THE COURT : All right , you understand the offer
is a $200 fine, Mr. Stacey, for breach of peace.

THE DEFENDANT: I understand, I understand, yes ,
I do. I cannot see you destroying my wife's guns.

THE COURT: The matter is transferred to the
trial docket in New Britain. The next date in New
Britain will be July 3rd at 2 o'clock.

MR. JAINCHILL: Thank you , Your Honor.

MS. BAIRD: Your Honor , Rachel Baird for the
record. We had intervened in this case. I represent
Duane Stacey in this case and she filed a motion for
return of seized property with regard to her ten
firearms and that motion was dated April 17, 2013. I
had understood that it was set down for hearing and
has there been - is there going to be a hearing on
that?

THE COURT: There is not going to be a hearing.

MS. BAIRD: Has there been a decision on the
motion?

THE COURT: No. The matter is on the trial list.
The allegation in this file is that a weapon was used
to threaten somebody. Whose weapon it was - it was
his or his wife's I don't know. Any decision on the
guns - the guns are ordered held by the Court until
the end of either the trial or the case is disposed
of. At that time, the Judge who disposes of the case
either by trial or otherwise can decide what to do
with the guns. Until then the guns are ordered held
as potential evidence of the crime.

MS. BAIRD: Understood, Your Honor, thank you.

THE COURT: That's at 2 o'clock, Mr. Jainchill,
in New Britain. It's a 2 o'clock marking.

Boy, Ed; doesn't this horse manure look familiar! I've really had it with the bullsh*t judges in this state; here's hoping Rachel hands him his ass; here again, no crime committed, and the process is now being used as punishment.

Chew this idiot judge up and spit him out; he doesn't belong on the bench.

DDoutel said:

Boy, Ed; doesn't this horse manure look familiar! I've really had it with the bullsh*t judges in this state; here's hoping Rachel hands him his ass; here again, no crime committed, and the process is now being used as punishment.

Chew this idiot judge up and spit him out; he doesn't belong on the bench.

Click to expand...

It certainly is outrageous that a judge will not hear a motion that is properly before it; irrespective if it is scheduled for trial, both parties deserve a ruling.

Come election day for this judge, someone should post a notice so we can go door to door and inform people that this judge needs to be voted out of office.

The judge did not rule either way ... he punted basically ... the motion is still "alive" I think ... why is he a judge if he does not want to rule on motions?