I was relatively impressed with him up until he said that limiting magazine capacity is a good way to reduce mass killings while completely ignoring the VA Tech mass killing where 10 round mags were used.
He also completely ignored the 2A argument that we have the right to defend ourselves not only from crime, but from our own gov. He focused only on the "safety" aspect and how to reduce gun violence. Which is to completely blind yourself to an entire aspect of the debate. He tried really hard, but was not very successful in being "reasoned."