• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

gathering data - is it really 40%?

DCR

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2008
Messages
162
Location
, ,
97% (rounded to nearest whole number) did not involve a background check.
 

MAC702

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Jul 31, 2011
Messages
6,331
Location
Nevada
These statistics are probably very misleading.

Many of us trade firearms back and forth among acquaintances and even friends. If you personally know each other, the firearm transfer did indeed involve a "background check." The value of personal knowledge was at least one time recognized by the state. For example, it used to be (maybe still is) that a Notary Public could notarize without ID if they personally knew the individual.

Indeed, personal knowledge is actually MORE invasive than a government background check, which can only find things that have been officially reported to the government.

I have a friend that works for the FBI. REGARDLESS of the background check, to be hired they will find many of your relatives and friends and ask them about you. They will do so every couple years while you work there, including talking to ex-wives.
 
Last edited:

JDPrice

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2012
Messages
27
Location
Oklahoma
That number came from data that was acquired before NICS was in effect...

My stance is that if you are not currently incarcerated or have relinquished your rights in some other way, there is no reason you shouldn't be able to pick one up off the shelf and purchase it.
 

Black_water

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2013
Messages
125
Location
On The Border in AZ
Didn't the 40% number come from some survey done in the 90's of only 300 people +/-?

It is not really relevant though as they do not want to connect those sales to crimes. There is way too much data out there that shows that private sales (not straw purchases) don't really contribute to many guns on the streets.

This article does a pretty good summation of how guns get to the street:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/guns/procon/guns.html

Straw Purchases
Corrupt FFL
Guns lost, stolen missing from FFL
Guys selling guns from the sources in this list
Stolen

It does not even touch personal sales.

It is all politics and agenda. The left wants guns out of the hands of citizens. This is just a ruse to do it.

The Sandy Hook shooter failed a background check. The VA Tech shooter passed.

Background checks will solve nothing.
 

arentol

New member
Joined
Apr 10, 2009
Messages
383
Location
Kent, Washington, USA
Didn't the 40% number come from some survey done in the 90's of only 300 people +/-?

Agree with basically everything you said.

However, I do want to point out that even a survey of only 300, if done correctly (which is the hardest part by far), can be accurate to within about 6%, even when used to extrapolate to a population of 300 million.

Doesn't mean the survey in question was accurate, I just want people to understand that even relatively small groups (absolute minimum 100) are pretty effective representatives of very very large groups.



Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
 

We-the-People

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
2,221
Location
White City, Oregon, USA
Agree with basically everything you said.

However, I do want to point out that even a survey of only 300, if done correctly (which is the hardest part by far), can be accurate to within about 6%, even when used to extrapolate to a population of 300 million.

Doesn't mean the survey in question was accurate, I just want people to understand that even relatively small groups (absolute minimum 100) are pretty effective representatives of very very large groups.



Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2

Ahhhh but the questions have to be written perfectly to prevent unintended bias in the answers AND the sample has to actually reflect the population....that's probably the hardest to try to get or correct for.
 

11C1P

New member
Joined
Aug 16, 2013
Messages
7
Location
North Dakota
Every gun I have bought except for my first pistol I have had my CCP, and when I bought that 1st pistol I was waiting for my permit to come in the mail which it did a couple weeks later. this was back in '93 before they had background checks. When I buy guns from a dealer, I hand them my permit and there is no background check, as my permit is the background check. So depending on how you want to look at it either all of my guns purchased through an FFL since the brady bill have been with a background check, or none of my purchases whether FFL or private had a background check. One guy a bought an AK from an internet ad made me sign a piece of paper saying I bought the gun from him and he was no longer liable for whatever the gun did.:rolleyes: He never asked to see my permit or ask if I had one.
 
Top