Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Connecticut Carry - Press Release - DESPP using Deception to Confiscate Firearms

  1. #1
    Regular Member Rich B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    North Branford, Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    2,910

    Connecticut Carry - Press Release - DESPP using Deception to Confiscate Firearms

    From: http://ctcarry.com/News/Release/0a62...0-384f2945d428

    Press Release

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:


    DESPP using Deception to Confiscate Firearms

    Misleading Interpretations and Threats by State Police result in Permanent Loss of Property

    Middletown, Connecticut, July 1st, 2013:

    The Connecticut State Police through the Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection have been sending threatening and misleading letters to Connecticut residents telling them that they must turn in their firearms to the State Police without any lawful justification.

    In one such example, a resident was the subject of an ex parte restraining order. State law clearly states that such an individual is only ineligible to possess firearms when:

    a restraining or protective order of a court of this state that has been issued against such person, after notice and an opportunity to be heard has been provided to such person, -- 53a-217(a)(3) and 53a-217c(a)5

    Federal law provides that a person is ineligible to possess firearms when they are:

    subject to a court order that (A) was issued after a hearing of which such person received actual notice, and at which time such person had an opportunity to participate -- 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(8)

    Instead of following the law and waiting until the resident had been given notice and an opportunity to be heard as the law prescribes; the State Police sent a letter threatening arrest if the resident did not turn over all of their firearms. The restraining order ended up being dissolved before the resident became ineligible to possess firearms, but because of the 2013 gun ban that went into effect 4/4/2013, some of the firearms and magazines this person possessed can never be transferred back to them.

    Because of the Connecticut State Police and DESPP not knowing or following the law, a resident of Connecticut may have permanently lost property that rightfully belongs to him and should have never been in the possession of the State Police to begin with. This is yet another case involving the seizure of firearms where members of the State Police, DESPP and the Special License and Firearms Unit (SLFU) have been found doing business their way rather than following the law.

    Attorney Rachel Baird is the attorney investigating this particular instance as well as several other questionable practices and misunderstandings of existing laws. She went on to address these in a recent letter to Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection (DESPP) Commissioner Reuben Bradford.

    Cases like this demonstrate the fact that experienced members of law enforcement who are assigned to firearm related cases on a daily basis lack the required understanding of firearm laws.

    Connecticut Carry will continue to work to educate members of the public and the members of these state agencies as well as local police departments about the rights of the public and the laws of the state. We will also work to stop these rogue units from engaging in abusive behavior towards the public.

    More information on this issue can be found on http://ctcarry.com

    Connecticut Carry is dedicated to advancing and protecting the fundamental civil rights of the men and women of Connecticut to keep and bear arms for defense of themselves and the state as guaranteed by the United States Constitution and the Constitution of Connecticut.

    Contact:
    Richard Burgess
    President
    Connecticut Carry, Inc
    Ph: 203-208-9577
    Email: rich@ctcarry.com
    http://ctcarry.com
    Connecticut Carry is dedicated to advancing and protecting the fundamental civil rights of the men and women of Connecticut to keep and bear arms for self defense of themselves and the state as guaranteed by the United States Constitution and the Constitution of Connecticut.

    Join us and discuss the issues: http://ctcarry.com/Forum

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    earth's crust
    Posts
    17,838
    Who says that they don't understand the laws? They have been confiscating firearms for a long time. They know the law and rules. There is a whole bookcase full of such instances/cases at the OLR lobby on the 5th floor of the legislative office building.

    And look at the forms that they output, ostensibly in respect to PA13-3. Asking for irrelevant information, information that they cannot legally ask for, and asking us to sign a statement that is a legal conclusion to insure that any tiny violation will be found to be "trying to deceive a public servant".

    I visited my state representative today and let him know that the 2 new DPS forms are defective and I could not see any citizen completing them without putting themselves in serious risk beyond what the legislature required or expected.

    The postings on this site and others were useful in hitting point after point home with the legislative aide (my state rep voted no on PA13-3 although his is a demorat ~ several people in our community swayed him I think ~ I know I did what I could).

    DESPP has little concern for the law I'm afraid .... I don't think that the confiscation was an error .. quite on purpose. And I don't know if any relief is possible for the folks who turned in their guns. Its unfortunate.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •