• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

ADD Another Mississippi Sheriff to the OATH BREAKERS LIST!

rtd2

New member
Joined
Jul 12, 2013
Messages
4
Location
mississippi
I believe Judge Kidd, D.A. Smith, Sen. Horton and Sheriff Lewis will get their butts collectively handed to them when the supreme court of Ms over turns this activists judges order soon! and I Can't wait! Come on AG Hood and supreme court! but this LOCAL Sheriff ALSO needs to be defeated come re-election! he needs to be reminded of his Oath the U.S. and Mississippi Constitution he swore to defend ! its VERY clear Melvin Brisolara on why you DON'T have the RIght to question me simply cause I have a Gun. I fired off an Email to him reminding him! ... everyone Read along now----

Article 3, Section 12. Right to bear arms.
The right of every citizen to keep and bear arms in defense of his home, his person, or property, or in aid of the civil power when thereto legally summoned, shall not be called in question, but the legislature may only regulate or forbid carrying concealed weapons.
SOURCES: 1817 art I § 23; 1832 art I § 23; 1869 art I § 15.


Brisolara said with the new law, officers will not be able to question anyone on the street with a weapon without probable cause, even to ask for their identification. And there's no way of knowing if the person carrying a firearm is a convicted felon, he said. "That's the whole basis of providing security for the community," he said. Brisolara said the legislators making these decisions have not fully thought out all the consequences officers will face. On Friday, Kidd put an injunction on the law until the state Legislature can clarify it. "They're putting an undue burden on front-line officers in the streets," Brisolara said. "We need people to help them (officers) and get clarity of these laws."

Read more here: http://www.sunherald.com/2013/07/12/4793430/brisolara-on-gun-law-we-dont-know.html#storylink=cpy
 

MKEgal

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2010
Messages
4,383
Location
in front of my computer, WI
I think Mr. Brisolara needs to communicate with colleagues in Constituitonal Carry states and real Open Carry states (which his is trying to become) in order to learn that there are not problems.

And maybe he should read the FBI study (about criminals who had killed LEO) which says that criminals do not carry openly and almost never use holsters.
 

MSG Laigaie

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Jan 10, 2011
Messages
3,239
Location
Philipsburg, Montana
Brisolara said with the new law, officers will not be able to question anyone on the street with a weapon without probable cause, even to ask for their identification. And there's no way of knowing if the person carrying a firearm is a convicted felon, he said. "That's the whole basis of providing security for the community," he said. Brisolara said the legislators making these decisions have not fully thought out all the consequences officers will face. On Friday, Kidd put an injunction on the law until the state Legislature can clarify it. "They're putting an undue burden on front-line officers in the streets," Brisolara said. "We need people to help them (officers) and get clarity of these laws.

On the first part, were they doing these kind of illegal terry stops before the new law?? "I can't stop them without probable cause!!" Really??

On the second..This is so ridiculous I cannot address it.

On the third, is following or learning the law an undue burden?
 

davidmcbeth

Banned
Joined
Jan 14, 2012
Messages
16,167
Location
earth's crust
On the first part, were they doing these kind of illegal terry stops before the new law?? "I can't stop them without probable cause!!" Really??

On the second..This is so ridiculous I cannot address it.

On the third, is following or learning the law an undue burden?

Cops who feel its a burden? They are free to seek other employment. If they think that they have a safety issue then they should contact OSHA.
 
Top