eye95
Well-known member
He is asking what if M had been of age and had been armed. Could he have stood his ground and shot Z?
How stupid. No. Z did NOTHING threatening to M. M attacked Z!
Following someone suspicious, breaking off that surveillance when asked to do so, and walking back to your truck is neither illegal nor threatening.
So, no, instigator-in-chief, M would have been guilty of murder if he had shot and killed Z. Hell, he would have been guilty of murder had Z not shot him! After all, he did illegally attack Z even though he did not have a gun.
Worst president ever, doing everything possible to destroy the Republic.
How stupid. No. Z did NOTHING threatening to M. M attacked Z!
Following someone suspicious, breaking off that surveillance when asked to do so, and walking back to your truck is neither illegal nor threatening.
So, no, instigator-in-chief, M would have been guilty of murder if he had shot and killed Z. Hell, he would have been guilty of murder had Z not shot him! After all, he did illegally attack Z even though he did not have a gun.
Worst president ever, doing everything possible to destroy the Republic.