Thread: Iowa permits OC by legally blind
Here's an eye opener. Article doesn't state in perfect detail if they're talking about OC, but it looks like it to me. Goes into details of definition of 'legally blind' versus completely and totally blind. Up to Sheriff in each county to make the determination. I like that they got completely blind since birth Stevie Wonder to say it was stupid a dumb idea - they didn't state if Stevie has sighted folks around him that carry his guns....
The only terrorists I see nowadays are at the Capital.
The statements made in this post do not necessarily reflect the views of OCDO or its members.
Not so scary, option 2: A completely blind person would likely not have the ability to determine an attack was imminent (depending on the manner fo attack, of course) and being unable to see would therefore probably rely on the ability to make a contact shot when assaulted. Also would need proper training. Again, a different sort of training than a sighted person, or even legally blind but still partially sighted person.
Last edited by JustaShooter; 09-09-2013 at 08:43 AM.
Christian, Husband, Father
NRA Life Member
NRA Certified Range Safety Officer
NRA Certified Pistol & Rifle Instructor
Anything I post in these forums is my personal opinion formed by my own interpretation of the topic.
IANAL and anything I say is not intended to be nor should it be taken as legal advice.
Depending upon the state and why the vision is being judged, 'legal blindness' can be anywhere from 20/200 (blind enough to warrant a cane) down to 20/70 (can't drive an automobile).
Last edited by Fallschirmjäger; 09-09-2013 at 09:13 AM.
I find armed LEOs far scarier than a blind guy, law-abiding or criminal.
If he's law abiding you can simply leave him alone. If he's a criminal, you can just run away.
Either way, meh. If a blind person believes he will benefit from armed self-defense, who the heck am I to question it? Or even call it "scary"?
What next, will the totalitarian socialists complain that the dumb have freedom of speech? (dumb may mean either mute or stupid, they both apply)
I completely support this. I support those that are completely blind exercising their right to defend themselves just like those who have perfect vision. Just because we have an impairment should not automatically strip us of our Natural rights. There are many instances when a completely blind individual could use a firearm for self-defense.
I do not have any concern when it comes to those that are legally blind carrying firearms. Many people who are legally blind actually have fairly good vision with the proper corrective lenses. The terminology makes it sound worse than it actually is, because when you throw the word "blind" in the mix it gives people a false sense of what is actually being described. Regardless of the impairment, we ALL have God-given or Natural rights that we are born with, and the right to defend our lives however we see fit is one of those rights.
"I never in my life seen a Kentuckian without a gun..."-Andrew Jackson
"Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect every one who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined."-Patrick Henry; speaking of protecting the rights of an armed citizenry.
As far as I am concerned, blind is basically a binary status. The phrase "legally blind" is nothing but an example of dilution of language for no purpose other than to satisfy some bureaucratic nitwit's regulatory fetish.
Why can't we just call them "visually impaired"? Probably because that doesn't sound scary enough to justify arbitrarily classifying them as fully incapable (regardless of what their actual degree of capability is). So, better call them "blind" for maximum emotional appeal impact. Except, they're not blind, so now we have to create the fiction of "legally" blind.
Last edited by marshaul; 09-11-2013 at 10:21 AM.
last i looked my permit says "to carry weapons" a lot of home invastions happen at night so unless you have a light arnt you pretty much "blind" anyway? trying not to bring this up on purpose but wasnt the place where tryvon was shot pretty dark? i bet george didnt need to see him to shoot him. if im not mistaken dont you need a permit to carry if you are carrying a taser in iowa? or a knife thats long then i think 5 inches?