• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Full Faith And Credit

r_spald01

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2013
Messages
1
Location
57401
Recently a judge ruled that a state must offer same sex couples the health care coverage benefits as heterosexual couples if they were married in a state that recognizes same sex marriage due to the full faith and credit clause of the constitution.
Under that premise wouldn't a state (say California) be required to acknowlege a persons right to open carry if they are from a state that recognises this right (for instance South Dakota)? Just curious.
 

Citizen

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2006
Messages
18,269
Location
Fairfax Co., VA
Recently a judge ruled that a state must offer same sex couples the health care coverage benefits as heterosexual couples if they were married in a state that recognizes same sex marriage due to the full faith and credit clause of the constitution.
Under that premise wouldn't a state (say California) be required to acknowlege a persons right to open carry if they are from a state that recognises this right (for instance South Dakota)? Just curious.

You would think so.

But, there's never been a case on that point that made it all the way to SCOTUS. So, Kalifornia would just arrest you and force you to defend yourself at vast expense all the way to SCOTUS, and then hope they ruled in your favor, something I wouldn't trust them to do. Not at all.
 

Grapeshot

Legendary Warrior
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
35,317
Location
Valhalla
First you must obey the laws of the state in which you are then presently standing, whether that be California or Virginia. It is that state that will charge you for any violation of their laws......and the defense for that which you suggest will not be cheap.

There is no reciprocity of permits and no federal law protecting you while OCing, unless you wish to claim the 2A as your defense - unfortunatly good luck with that.
 

Grapeshot

Legendary Warrior
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
35,317
Location
Valhalla
Recently a judge ruled that a state must offer same sex couples the health care coverage benefits as heterosexual couples if they were married in a state that recognizes same sex marriage due to the full faith and credit clause of the constitution.
Under that premise wouldn't a state (say California) be required to acknowlege a persons right to [highlight]open carry[/highlight] if they are from a state that recognises this right (for instance South Dakota)? Just curious.

--snipped--

Anyone notice that a mod replied to the thread and that he did not bother to move it to the Social Lounge?
Didn't move it to the Social Lounge because it is on topic where it is.

I have bolded and highlighted so that you may better see that which you missed the first time..
 
Last edited:
Top