Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Bigger govt., IRS rides 1884 'dead horse' law to defense of rules for tax preparers.

  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Thru Death's Door in Wisconsin

    Bigger govt., IRS rides 1884 'dead horse' law to defense of rules for tax preparers.

    "The Obama administration on Tuesday defended its effort to regulate the tax return preparation business for the first time in U.S. history, basing its case largely on a 19th century law dealing with horses lost or killed in the Civil War. At an appellate court hearing on a challenge brought by libertarian lawyers challenging the administration, Justice Department Tax Division lawyer Gilbert Rothenberg said: "I hate to beat a dead horse, especially one from the Civil War era."

    A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit heard the administration's argument. Rothenberg said the IRS should be allowed to force tax return preparers - who are now unregulated - to pass a competency test and take annual continuing education classes. But the Institute for Justice, a libertarian advocacy law firm, disagreed. "Congress never gave the IRS authority to regulate tax preparers," said Dan Alban, an attorney for the institute."
    If TRUMP 2016 loses then I will shrug off my WHITE MAN'S BURDEN and leave the world to the Dindus and Done Nuffins. Read and understand Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged as a prescription for the future. TRUMP 2016

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    earth's crust
    While it seeems reasonable, its actually not.

    The tax filer is the one responsible for his filings, not the tax preparer.

    After that, goofy tax preparers are handled by the civil courts.

  3. #3
    Regular Member Freedom1Man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Greater Eastside Washington
    Oh, wait, in 1861 or was it 1862 an income tax levied on (army officers) any citizen was ruled unconstitutional.

    Then it was ruled that a direct tax on citizens was unconstitutional.

    Then it was ruled that the 16th Amendment conferred no new powers of taxation.

    So, why do you even care about some rule leveled against those who prepare taxes? If they say that you're required to file then they are too stupid to do your taxes in the first place. If you have them file taxes, that you're not required to file in the first, then you're not any smarter than they are.
    Provision for free medical attendance and nursing, for clothing, for food, for housing, for the education of children, and a hundred other matters, might with equal propriety be proposed as tending to relieve the employee of mental strain and worry. --- These matters obviously lie outside the orbit of congressional power. (Railroad Retirement Board v Alton Railroad)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts