Thread: New news from Oberlin...
The Plain Dealer editors thought we were bluffing...
Press release at OFCC
A slam dunk yes?
But the penalty is minimal, unfortunately.
This. Is. Awesome.
These cities need to see what will happen if they choose to ignore the law, or pretend it doesn't apply to them.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk 2
Christian, Husband, Father
NRA Life Member
NRA Certified Range Safety Officer
NRA Certified Pistol & Rifle Instructor
Anything I post in these forums is my personal opinion formed by my own interpretation of the topic.
IANAL and anything I say is not intended to be nor should it be taken as legal advice.
If the law is found to violate 9.68, is the city on the hook for the legal expenses involved in bringing the suit?
IANAL, but, yeah, I'd say so.ORC 9.68
(B) In addition to any other relief provided, the court shall award costs and reasonable attorney fees to any person, group, or entity that prevails in a challenge to an ordinance, rule, or regulation as being in conflict with this section.
But, hey he knows everything on all subjects, even the law in all other States.
I think the Clyde case was because 9.68 didn't allow fee collection at the time the original case was filed. The original case started before the currently 9.68 wording took effect to allow recovery of the fees. The appeal was filed after 9.68 was in full force but I think the appeals court denied collecting fees since it wasn't law on initial filing.