Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: NYPD psychopath plotted to abduct, slow cook, and eat women

  1. #1
    Regular Member minarchist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Fredericksburg, VA
    Posts
    495

    Thumbs down NYPD psychopath plotted to abduct, slow cook (alive!), and eat women

    A city cop with a taste for human flesh was charged Thursday with plotting to kidnap, torture, “slow cook” and eat women he tracked down through law enforcement databases.

    ...

    He once boasted in an instant message to a depraved ally that his oven was “big enough to fit one of these girls if I folded their legs.”

    ...

    “I was thinking of tying her body onto some kind of apparatus . . . cook her over a low heat and keep her alive as long as possible,” he wrote to an alleged co-conspirator just days before the lunch date.
    http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/...icle-1.1191956

    Why are vicious animals like this given tremendous power over the lives of peaceful, innocent people?
    Last edited by minarchist; 10-08-2013 at 09:03 PM.

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Fairborn, Ohio, USA
    Posts
    13,063
    Such vicious animals are found in all walks of life. Actually, this is the first I have ever heard of a cop cannibal.

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    earth's crust
    Posts
    17,838

  4. #4
    Regular Member Black_water's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    On The Border in AZ
    Posts
    152
    Quote Originally Posted by eye95 View Post
    Such vicious animals are found in all walks of life. Actually, this is the first I have ever heard of a cop cannibal.
    True, however LEOs are subjected to much more scrutiny, testing etc than the rest of us.

    What I would like to know is what proportion of LEOs engage in X behavior vs any other occupation. If it is equal or higher than the rest of us, that just proves their testing and screening needs to be tweaked.

  5. #5
    Regular Member sudden valley gunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Whatcom County
    Posts
    17,338
    Quote Originally Posted by Black_water View Post
    True, however LEOs are subjected to much more scrutiny, testing etc than the rest of us.

    What I would like to know is what proportion of LEOs engage in X behavior vs any other occupation. If it is equal or higher than the rest of us, that just proves their testing and screening needs to be tweaked.
    It's higher I have posted the studies before, they get prosecuted a lot less too.
    I am not anti Cop I am just pro Citizen.

    U.S. v. Minker, 350 US 179, at page 187
    "Because of what appears to be a lawful command on the surface, many citizens, because
    of their respect for what only appears to be a law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their
    rights, due to ignorance." (Paraphrased)

  6. #6
    Regular Member Maverick9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Mid-atlantic
    Posts
    1,505
    Giving new meaning to 'bringing your wife to a slow boil...'.

  7. #7
    Regular Member Black_water's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    On The Border in AZ
    Posts
    152
    Quote Originally Posted by sudden valley gunner View Post
    It's higher I have posted the studies before, they get prosecuted a lot less too.
    Interesting.

  8. #8
    Campaign Veteran skidmark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    North Chesterfield VA
    Posts
    10,682
    this is old news and is just another attempt to bash cops as bad.

    no question some cops are bad, just as some ocdo posters are bad. but this is getting boring (among other things it is getting). how about you take your displeasure to a site set up specifically to address the way you feel.

    stay safe.
    "He'll regret it to his dying day....if ever he lives that long."----The Quiet Man

    Because stupidity isn't a race, and everybody can win.

    "No matter how much contempt you have for the media in all this, you don't have enough"
    ----Allahpundit

  9. #9
    Campaign Veteran marshaul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Fairfax County, Virginia
    Posts
    11,487
    Quote Originally Posted by Black_water View Post
    True, however LEOs are subjected to much more scrutiny, testing etc than the rest of us.


    Best joke I've heard all day.

  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    earth's crust
    Posts
    17,838
    Quote Originally Posted by Black_water View Post
    True, however LEOs are subjected to much more scrutiny, testing etc than the rest of us.
    Like what? They don't get routinely drug tested like many non-gov't employees; in fact, you talk steroids and they go into a rage about periodic testing for this category of drugs.
    Last edited by davidmcbeth; 10-11-2013 at 03:40 PM.

  11. #11
    Regular Member Black_water's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    On The Border in AZ
    Posts
    152
    Quote Originally Posted by davidmcbeth View Post
    Like what? They don't get routinely drug tested like many non-gov't employees; in fact, you talk steroids and they go into a rage about periodic testing for this category of drugs.
    Right.

    They are subject to drug tests. In addition they are psych tested, voice stress analysis tested, polygraph tested, extensively background checked among other things.

    This is not something most people deal with when applying for a job which is my point.

  12. #12
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    earth's crust
    Posts
    17,838
    Quote Originally Posted by Black_water View Post
    Right.

    They are subject to drug tests. In addition they are psych tested, voice stress analysis tested, polygraph tested, extensively background checked among other things.

    This is not something most people deal with when applying for a job which is my point.
    They are NOT subject to routine drug tests...where do you get that they are? Many people go through the same ... I have and more with routine BR chks run for example !

    And they do this during the APPLICATION process ... never afterwards ... and here's a clue: most people would pass all those requirements ... you make it sound like cops are the only people with clean BRs....

  13. #13
    Regular Member Black_water's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    On The Border in AZ
    Posts
    152
    Quote Originally Posted by davidmcbeth View Post
    They are NOT subject to routine drug tests...where do you get that they are? Many people go through the same ... I have and more with routine BR chks run for example !

    And they do this during the APPLICATION process ... never afterwards ... and here's a clue: most people would pass all those requirements ... you make it sound like cops are the only people with clean BRs....
    No, I am saying that in order to be a LEO you would be subjected to (whether pre or during) a level of scrutiny that is not required for most jobs.

    So, it is my opinion, given three choices: 1) less 2) average or 3) more, that LEOs go through a level of scrutiny that is 3) more than most people applying for most jobs.

    I don't know what you are reading, but I am not suggesting anything other than what I just posted.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •