• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

MILLER: Justice delayed is justice denied - Appeal for decision on D.C.’s gun carry-r

ccwinstructor

Centurion
Joined
Jul 11, 2008
Messages
919
Location
Yuma, Arizona, USA
The nation’s capital is the only place in America where no one is allowed to exercise his right to bear arms.

This is clearly unconstitutional, but the courts have thrown up repeated roadblocks to delay the law getting overturned for more than four years. The federal appeals court now will decide if this delay can continue.

SEE ALSO: MILLER: D.C. businessman faces two years in jail for unregistered ammunition, brass casing

On Tuesday, attorney Alan Gura petitioned for a writ of mandamus to the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia on behalf of the plaintiffs to force the district court judge to issue an opinion in the case Palmer v. District of Columbia.

This type of request is rare in the legal process.

“We’re not sure what else we’re supposed to do,” the lawyer representing the Second Amendment Foundation in the case told me in an interview. “It’s not a step we took casually, but we don’t wish to wait another four years.”

The appeals court can either deny it summarily or ask for a response from the District before holding arguments and then ruling.

George Lyon is one of the plaintiffs in the case and an attorney who lives in the District. He noted that Mr. Gura first tried to go to Judge Frederick J. Scullin directly by filing a motion to expedite the case.

“Mandamus was our only option because there is no other way to force the judge to make a decision,” said Mr. Lyon. “The lack of a decision places me at risk any time I leave my house without the most effective means available to protect myself, a right clearly spelled out in the Constitution.”

SEE ALSO: MILLER: Female, off-duty D.C. cop shoots assailant, but the rest of us are sitting ducks

The Palmer case was first filed in August 2009 by petitioners who said that the Second Amendment guarantees the right to carry arms outside the home for self-defense. They asserted that while that right may be regulated — as it is in most states’ various degrees of concealed-carry permits laws — it cannot be completely forbidden.

Judge Henry H. Kennedy heard arguments in the case in Jan. 2010, but he never issued a ruling.

Finally, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts intervened in in order to expedite its decision in July 2011 and reassigned this case to Judge Scullin of New York.

Even then, Judge Scullin waited until Oct. 1, 2012, to rehear arguments. After both sides presented their cases, the judge promised a decision “within a short period of time.”

A full year has since passed, and Judge Scullin has not made a peep. Mr. Gura said that, “The delay is unusual.”

As the D.C. case enters its fifth year, the contrast in time frame is stark compared to the last state to have its total ban on carry rights overturned.


http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/oct/23/miller-justice-delayed-justice-denied-appeal-decis/

I believe that opencarry.org members can pat themselves on the back for this article. I used the saga on opencarry.org to write this article on gun watch:

Justice Denied:Second Amendment Case Delayed for Years in D.C.

http://gunwatch.blogspot.com/2013/09/justice-deniedsecond-amendment-case.html

I sent the article to Emily Miller, who I had met at the GRPC last year.

I like to think that Emily used it as a starting place for her own great article. If you see this, Emily, thanks for getting the word out. Good Job!
 

davidmcbeth

Banned
Joined
Jan 14, 2012
Messages
16,167
Location
earth's crust
One who has a grievance with the government then goes to the government to settle the grievance? Expect to wait.

Of course the judges are not going to rule.

"only option is mandamus"....that's not true.
 
Top