Actually, the above is the only post (apart from those by the subject troll) that I would classify as being "drama queenish." The irony is thick.
If you don't like that which you think is drama queenish, don't participate, or else you become exactly that which you decry.
Ed doesn't like me over one incident and has been trolling me ever since. The incident? I went out for a smoke at a BFPE hearing and Ed was telling a gun owner that he could carry his gun (the guy had no permit) as long as he was going to a shooting range (not for a NRA class, just to target shoot) and showed the guy a letter written by a lawyer for DESPP, attorney Thomas Hatfield. Now, I have seen this letter before and its full of garbage.
I told the guy that he would be arrested because I queried the same subject matter with two DAs and 5 police chiefs I was told that without a permit, one would be arrested for this act.
Ed went ballistic and did what Ed does...
Ed is the director of ctcarry.
Its one thing to make arguments over the law; its another to present a person with a defective informal letter from a government official and claim that it offers a person immunity from being tossed into prison.
Of course, Ed and attorney Hatfield are friends ...
But even I would not do what Ed had been doing for years ... giving people the impression that the government allows one to do something when that act would clearly cause a person, relying upon the information being provided by the director of ctcarry as being accurate, to be subjected to a prison sentence.