Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: FOP complains about HB 203 removing OC as RAS for a terry stop

  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Cuyahoga County, Ohio
    Posts
    219

    FOP complains about HB 203 removing OC as RAS for a terry stop

    From the Columbus Dispatch:

    A proposed change to how police handle situations involving someone carrying a gun also is drawing significant attention from those who say it adds confusion to the law and would hinder efforts by law enforcement in preventing crime.

    Under sections of state law dealing with the crimes of inducing panic and disorderly conduct, House Bill 203 adds: “The exercise of a constitutional or statutory right is not, in itself, a violation of this section and does not constitute reasonable, articulable suspicion of criminal activity.”
    http://www.dispatch.com/content/stor...some-fear.html

  2. #2
    Regular Member JustaShooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    728
    Which just codifies in Ohio law something that has already been established by case law, but certain **** LEOs continue to disregard, which is why it is in HB203. The FOP, a purely political organization that does not accurately represent the views of rank-and-file LEO, is on the wrong side of this as they are on many topics.
    Last edited by Grapeshot; 11-25-2013 at 01:55 PM.
    Christian, Husband, Father
    NRA Life Member
    NRA Certified Range Safety Officer
    NRA Certified Pistol & Rifle Instructor

    Anything I post in these forums is my personal opinion formed by my own interpretation of the topic.
    IANAL and anything I say is not intended to be nor should it be taken as legal advice.

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Northern, Virginia, USA
    Posts
    150

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Fairborn, Ohio, USA
    Posts
    13,063
    This change simply seems to simply codify Black for the hard-of-thinking.


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk.

    <o>

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    earth's crust
    Posts
    17,838
    Normally, like 99% of the time, court decisions are just left alone if they address a subject.

    Now they want a new law? Great ! Now it becomes law and not just case law.

    An even stronger one.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •