Law abider
Regular Member
I was mistaken. I thought we had a strong backing from our sheriffs to uphold and defend the constitution. Now I gather my sheriff (Pierce county) will do so in name only. She has refused to state publicly that she will defend it. She has not come to our meetings, especially when the 2A group hosted Kris Anne Hall's 5 hr seminar on the constitution. In the list enclosed, we have only three sheriffs who will defend our right to keep and bear arms!! THREE! and how many counties we have in this state? In Pierce Bill Perks, a retired Sp forces guy is running for sheriff. He has said he will uphold the constitution. The problem seems that the feds and sheriffs sign agreements that work against the sheriffs. Any input. This is not a good thing when we have THREE sheriffs for us. Just look at CA, CO and UT.
http://cspoa.org/sheriffs-gun-rights/
http://cspoa.org/sheriffs-gun-rights/
Last edited: