countryclubjoe
Regular Member
What are the fees charged to the citizen for the so called permit privilege?
CCJ
CCJ
What are the fees charged to the citizen for the so called permit privilege?
CCJ
Lots of folks in here from OUTSIDE CT talking trash. CT residents have been put in a tough spot, there is litigation pending to challenge the law. The only solution in the interim (if you're a normal person with family/job/assets that are more important than your gun) is to MOVE OUT OF STATE or comply. Lots of folks can't afford to up and move on short notice. The job market is tight.
IF you had to use your guns in self-defense, you can bet you will be thoroughly investigated...if you're then found to be in violation of the new law, those charges will be brought. In essence, failure to comply with the law would force you into hiding, and perhaps take away your ability to lawfully USE your guns without putting at risk your ability to own/use guns permanently (as a felon). The act of self-defense would in essence MAKE you into a felon just because you decided to not comply with the new law.
So, when you think about compliance/non-compliance...unless you wanna play Randy Weaver or David Koresh...you're pretty much stuck with compliance in CT or leaving the state altogether.
Permits run, cost wise, about $200-$300 bucks .... sweet huh?
Of course, I would just take these off my taxes on 15 APR ...
Enjoy being audited...
" What is the Justification for denying a person their rights" ?
My .02
Best regards
CCJ
Permits run, cost wise, about $200-$300 bucks .... sweet huh?
Of course, I would just take these off my taxes on 15 APR ...
Hi davidmcbeth
Folks are paying $200.00 to $300.00 per year for a permit/tax to exercise a natural right to protect themselves and their families..
Ignorance and Fear, the air supply for tyrants.
My .02
Best regards
CCJ
I
The why I see it, any so called ownership of an Assault Weapon prior to the enactment of the new definition would be grandfathered or exempt.
http://www.cga.ct.gov/2011/pub/chap943.htm#Sec53-202e.htm
It appears that the law is unconstitutional. The new definition of Assault Weapon has made what was legal now illegal.
The Constitution of the United States, art. 1, sec. 10, forbids the states to pass any ex post facto law; which has been defined to be one which renders the act punishable in a manner in which it was not punishable when it was committed.
The why I see it, any so called ownership of an Assault Weapon prior to the enactment of the new definition would be grandfathered or exempt.
http://www.cga.ct.gov/2011/pub/chap943.htm#Sec53-202e.htm
I agree that possession prior to the law could not be punishable, but what about continued possession after the law took effect?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk.
<o>
I wasn't asking you. I was asking someone who actually knows a thing or two about the law.
Those grandfathered guns will be the ones the town will keep down at the station for you - free of charge - and you can come 'borrow' them anytime you want, with 30 days written notice.
You sure were asking me .... by posting .... you gonna have a cow on every post of mine?...