MCC § 8-20-100 and its zoning ordinance (to the extent that it bans the
operation of gun stores in Chicago) are therefore unconstitutional.
IV. Conclusion
For the reasons discussed above, Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment [R.
174] is granted and the City’s motion for summary judgment [R. 157] is
denied.
http://www.volokh.com/2014/01/06/fi...ransferred-within-chicago-except-inheritance/
http://ia700501.us.archive.org/19/items/gov.uscourts.ilnd.245065/gov.uscourts.ilnd.245065.238.0.pdf
operation of gun stores in Chicago) are therefore unconstitutional.
IV. Conclusion
For the reasons discussed above, Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment [R.
174] is granted and the City’s motion for summary judgment [R. 157] is
denied.
http://www.volokh.com/2014/01/06/fi...ransferred-within-chicago-except-inheritance/
http://ia700501.us.archive.org/19/items/gov.uscourts.ilnd.245065/gov.uscourts.ilnd.245065.238.0.pdf