Results 1 to 25 of 25

Thread: Dallas Police Chief's Crackdown on Trigger-Happy Cops Leaves Many Fuming

  1. #1
    Regular Member Fuller Malarkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The Cadre
    Posts
    1,020

    Dallas Police Chief's Crackdown on Trigger-Happy Cops Leaves Many Fuming

    "Dallas Police Chief David Brown has started coming down hard on officers who are too quick to resort to deadly force. He fired senior corporal Amy Wilburn, who shot an unarmed carjacking suspect last month. Same with Carden Spencer, the cop who opened fire on a mentally ill man in a Rylie cul-de-sac in October, and Bryan Burgess, who ran over a suspicious-looking bicyclist during the spring.
    Compare that with Houston, where every police shooting over the past six years has been declared justified, and Brown seems like a paragon of justice and accountability."


    http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfa..._crackdown.php

    The stories the firings were based on:

    http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfa...man_with_h.php

    You'll remember this one.... mentally disturbed guy sitting on a roller stool in the cul de sac, cops pull up, scream at him, they drill him from 30 + ft. Then lied about him coming at them with a raised knife. Incident caught on neighbor's security camera.

    http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfa...chizophren.php

    This one I don't understand. Cop practices the standard operating procedure of running down and killing bicyclist because he "looked suspicious". That's what cops do, right? What's the problem? The world is a better place now with that suspicious bicyclist gone. Not only was this blue clad hero fired, he was arrested on a charge of criminally negligent homicide, which carries a potential sentence of six month to two years. PLUS the FBI is climbing up his rectum for civil rights violations involving the victim.

    I like Chief Brown.
    Liberty is so strongly a part of human nature that it can be treated as a no-lose argument position.
    ~Citizen

    From the cop’s perspective, the expression “law-abiding citizen” is a functional synonym for “Properly obedient slave".

    "People are not born being "anti-cop" and believing we live in a police state. That is a result of experience."

  2. #2
    Regular Member sudden valley gunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Whatcom County
    Posts
    16,690
    Yea for Chief Brown. He decided not to be an apologist for one reason or another, I hope he can win out against State backed Unions and their cronies in governemnt.
    I am not anti Cop I am just pro Citizen.

    U.S. v. Minker, 350 US 179, at page 187
    "Because of what appears to be a lawful command on the surface, many citizens, because
    of their respect for what only appears to be a law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their
    rights, due to ignorance." (Paraphrased)

  3. #3
    Regular Member Maverick9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Mid-atlantic
    Posts
    1,395
    Quote Originally Posted by Fuller Malarkey View Post
    This one I don't understand. Cop practices the standard operating procedure of running down and killing bicyclist because he "looked suspicious". That's what cops do, right? What's the problem? The world is a better place now with that suspicious bicyclist gone...

    I like Chief Brown.
    More on the bicyclist murder by cop.
    http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfa...llas_cop_w.php

  4. #4
    Regular Member stealthyeliminator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,100
    Cool, go Dallas.
    Advocate freedom please

  5. #5
    Regular Member Fuller Malarkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The Cadre
    Posts
    1,020
    Quote Originally Posted by Nightmare View Post
    ... He was not wearing a hat, so clearly suspiciously negligent /sarcasm.
    The bicyclist incident is interesting. Fred Bradford, the bicyclist, had no drugs or alcohol in his system, and he had no criminal record. There appears to be at least two patterns of corruption tying these cases together......one, unarmed people being preemptively exterminated. And two, each of these incidents involved police officers lying, and corroborating lies and attempts at covering up murders.

    On the same day he was fired, Burgess was arrested on the charge of criminally negligent homicide.

    Dallas County court records show there has been no action in the case since Sept. 6, when Burgess filed a motion for an examining trial.
    He has not been indicted. That could indicate that chief police Brown may have more opposition in cleaning out corruption than the police union. The no indictment indicates foot dragging or resistance from the prosecutor to me. The police union may have control of the prosecutors office, indicating a much deeper culture of corruption.

    On June 27, Virginia Bradford filed an excessive-force suit against the city and the officers for “more than $1,000,000.”

    It was eventually moved to federal court, where records indicate a settlement was reached on Nov. 8.

    Since 2001, there have been 68 killings of unarmed men by Dallas Police Department. Not one indictment. There has not been an indictment of a police officer for shooting in 40 years in Dallas.


    A Dallas County Grand Jury indicted the first cop from that county in 15 years this past November.

    http://crimeblog.dallasnews.com/2013...shooting.html/

    The Feds get a conviction here and there of Dallas police officers.

    http://www.speroforum.com/a/15719/Da...s#.UswWqNJDvZo

    In that one, a Dallas Transit cop "coerced" [why is it citizens get charged with rape in incidents like this, and cops get nicer sounding charges?] a woman to perform sex acts on him. The cop admitted that during the early morning hours of Oct. 10, 2004, he saw a woman at a Dallas convenience store, followed her, made a traffic stop of the car in which she was riding, and arrested her. Bonner then drove the woman to the Dallas County jail but did not take her inside. Instead, he drove her to an empty DART substation and told her he would release her if she engaged in sexual acts with him. The woman complied and, after they engaged in sexual acts, Bonner released her from custody. Bonner acknowledged that he violated the woman's constitutional rights and caused her bodily injury. Isolated incident 65,431. He got 30 months.
    Liberty is so strongly a part of human nature that it can be treated as a no-lose argument position.
    ~Citizen

    From the cop’s perspective, the expression “law-abiding citizen” is a functional synonym for “Properly obedient slave".

    "People are not born being "anti-cop" and believing we live in a police state. That is a result of experience."

  6. #6
    Regular Member OC for ME's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    White Oak Plantation
    Posts
    11,106
    The Dallas chief needs to grow a set of eyes on the back of his head.

  7. #7
    Regular Member SFCRetired's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Montgomery, Alabama, USA
    Posts
    1,737
    Personal opinion: The only way that I can think of to clean up these police departments is three-fold.
    1. Completely do away with police unions. Notice that I wrote "unions". They can have organizations devoted to officer safety and welfare, but without bargaining rights or the freedom to strike. "Blue flu", calling in sick as a "work action" would be grounds for suspension without pay for the first proven offense and termination for the second.
    2. De-militarize to the greatest extent possible. By this, I mean do away with no-knock warrants except under strict guidelines and minimize the amount of military-grade weaponry and equipment.
    3. Institute independent citizen review boards for all law enforcement agencies. The members of such boards would be picked from the jury pool, serve for no more than one year, and meet not less than once a month. These members, while serving, would be under the same immunity rules as most state legislators are. They would also have independent legal counsel at their meetings, chosen in similar manner as the members of the board.

    And OC for Me is right on the money when he says the chief had better grow a new set of eyeballs on the back of his head. There are very many good, honest police officers out there who are afraid to come forward because of the repercussions they will face. Francisco Vincent Serpico is a very good example of an honest cop who did the right thing and was made to suffer for it.
    "Happiness is a warm shotgun!!"
    "I am neither a pessimist nor a cynic. I am, rather, a realist."
    "The most dangerous things I've ever encountered were a Second Lieutenant with a map and a compass and a Private who was bored and had time on his hands."

  8. #8
    Regular Member Fallschirmjäger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Georgia, USA
    Posts
    3,761
    Maverick9]More on the bicyclist
    Quote Originally Posted by Nightmare View Post
    ... He was not wearing a hat, so clearly suspiciously negligent /sarcasm.
    Let's not forget that he allegedly reached into a vehicle occupied by mysterious, unidentified and unknown persons of the same ethnic persuasion, (or worse, occupied by persons of not the same ethnic persuasion) and may possibly have retrieved something.

    I'm willing to bet the thought, "How do we know that's not a drug deal?" was going through the officer's minds. The lack of helmet and lights just provided a legal opportunity to stop the individual.

    edit- retroactively added the word 'allegedly.'


    Fred Bradford Jr. dressed in what can no doubt be described as 'thuggish' clothing.
    Last edited by Fallschirmjäger; 01-07-2014 at 11:45 AM.

  9. #9
    Regular Member Maverick9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Mid-atlantic
    Posts
    1,395
    Quote Originally Posted by SFCRetired View Post
    Personal opinion: The only way that I can think of to clean up these police departments is three-fold.
    First, the PTB have to want to clean them up. Usually what prevents them is mutual blackmail.

  10. #10
    Regular Member Fuller Malarkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The Cadre
    Posts
    1,020
    Quote Originally Posted by SFCRetired View Post
    Personal opinion: The only way that I can think of to clean up these police departments is three-fold.
    1. Completely do away with police unions. Notice that I wrote "unions". They can have organizations devoted to officer safety and welfare, but without bargaining rights or the freedom to strike. "Blue flu", calling in sick as a "work action" would be grounds for suspension without pay for the first proven offense and termination for the second.
    2. De-militarize to the greatest extent possible. By this, I mean do away with no-knock warrants except under strict guidelines and minimize the amount of military-grade weaponry and equipment.
    3. Institute independent citizen review boards for all law enforcement agencies. The members of such boards would be picked from the jury pool, serve for no more than one year, and meet not less than once a month. These members, while serving, would be under the same immunity rules as most state legislators are. They would also have independent legal counsel at their meetings, chosen in similar manner as the members of the board.

    And OC for Me is right on the money when he says the chief had better grow a new set of eyeballs on the back of his head. There are very many good, honest police officers out there who are afraid to come forward because of the repercussions they will face. Francisco Vincent Serpico is a very good example of an honest cop who did the right thing and was made to suffer for it.
    It's obvious you've put some thought into solutions to this not so isolated problem. I believe everything you mention is what will be necessary for us to regain control of our police departments. I think we probably need more than "citizens review". Probably closer to "citizen control boards". This is a much misunderstood concept.....many buy into the police hype that meager citizens don't understand nor can they effectively investigate. There's many models of citizen control panels in use, the effective ones being hybrids tailored to fit the needs of the corruption being addressed and the desired outcome. Like jury nullification, it's a place citizens can attempt to regain control.
    Liberty is so strongly a part of human nature that it can be treated as a no-lose argument position.
    ~Citizen

    From the cop’s perspective, the expression “law-abiding citizen” is a functional synonym for “Properly obedient slave".

    "People are not born being "anti-cop" and believing we live in a police state. That is a result of experience."

  11. #11
    Regular Member Maverick9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Mid-atlantic
    Posts
    1,395
    The only way to accomplish these is through a complete clean sweep of admin and LE. I think NO is the only one that did that.

  12. #12
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    1,898
    Quote Originally Posted by SFCRetired View Post
    Francisco Vincent Serpico is a very good example of an honest cop who did the right thing and was made to suffer for it.
    Regina Tasca is another.

  13. #13
    Regular Member OC for ME's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    White Oak Plantation
    Posts
    11,106
    Quote Originally Posted by SFCRetired View Post
    Personal opinion: The only way that I can think of to clean up these police departments is three-fold.
    1. Completely do away with police unions. Notice that I wrote "unions". They can have organizations devoted to officer safety and welfare, but without bargaining rights or the freedom to strike. "Blue flu", calling in sick as a "work action" would be grounds for suspension without pay for the first proven offense and termination for the second.
    2. De-militarize to the greatest extent possible. By this, I mean do away with no-knock warrants except under strict guidelines and minimize the amount of military-grade weaponry and equipment.
    3. Institute independent citizen review boards for all law enforcement agencies. The members of such boards would be picked from the jury pool, serve for no more than one year, and meet not less than once a month. These members, while serving, would be under the same immunity rules as most state legislators are. They would also have independent legal counsel at their meetings, chosen in similar manner as the members of the board. <snip>
    A grandjury where the prosecutor is on the out and not the defense. So, we have a grand jury to indict criminals and we should have a grand jury to indict cops. Then a cop can have his union defend him via paying legal fees for the trial, just as a citizen is sent to trial after the prosecutor got a "ham samitch" indicted.

  14. #14
    Regular Member SFCRetired's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Montgomery, Alabama, USA
    Posts
    1,737
    My idea of the Citizens' Review Board would be not just another "rubber-stamp" agency, but an agency with some teeth to it. In fact, I would not be averse to granting such a board limited grand jury powers. This is also the reason they would have independent legal counsel.

    Another problem area is the fact that so many of the local courts are entirely to cozy with the associated law enforcement agencies. I know this to be true in Alabama and have no reason to doubt that it is true in other locations. What might be necessary to break that connection, I have no idea at this time. A separate court for law enforcement offenses?
    "Happiness is a warm shotgun!!"
    "I am neither a pessimist nor a cynic. I am, rather, a realist."
    "The most dangerous things I've ever encountered were a Second Lieutenant with a map and a compass and a Private who was bored and had time on his hands."

  15. #15
    Regular Member EMNofSeattle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    S. Kitsap, Washington state
    Posts
    3,670
    Quote Originally Posted by SFCRetired View Post
    My idea of the Citizens' Review Board would be not just another "rubber-stamp" agency, but an agency with some teeth to it. In fact, I would not be averse to granting such a board limited grand jury powers. This is also the reason they would have independent legal counsel.

    Another problem area is the fact that so many of the local courts are entirely to cozy with the associated law enforcement agencies. I know this to be true in Alabama and have no reason to doubt that it is true in other locations. What might be necessary to break that connection, I have no idea at this time. A separate court for law enforcement offenses?
    funny, because in one county in Washington all police related deaths are brought before an actual jury and the family of the slain gets to have their own lawyer question the officer and witnesses, and when this jury usually acquits officers then the anti-cop people just say "well the jury was rigged" some people are never happy regardless of the set up.
    they love our milk and honey, but they preach about some other way of living, when they're running down my country man they're walkin' on the fightin side of me

    NRA Member

  16. #16
    Regular Member SFCRetired's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Montgomery, Alabama, USA
    Posts
    1,737
    Quote Originally Posted by EMNofSeattle View Post
    funny, because in one county in Washington all police related deaths are brought before an actual jury and the family of the slain gets to have their own lawyer question the officer and witnesses, and when this jury usually acquits officers then the anti-cop people just say "well the jury was rigged" some people are never happy regardless of the set up.
    You are, of course, right. There is an old saying, "You wouldn't be happy if they hung you with a brand new rope!"

    What I have been attempting to do, in my rather uneducated way, is to come up with a solution that would, at the very least, lend much more transparency than is now the case in too many instances.

    When something goes wrong, we have police agencies investigating police agencies. Far too many times that results in a whitewash of the event. My "Citizens' Review Board" is my attempt to come up with an idea to reverse that situation. I am most familiar with happenings here in the Southeast and I can tell you that, while there are many good, honest officers and many agencies that are open and above-board, there are still too many that operate under unwritten rules that should have never been.
    "Happiness is a warm shotgun!!"
    "I am neither a pessimist nor a cynic. I am, rather, a realist."
    "The most dangerous things I've ever encountered were a Second Lieutenant with a map and a compass and a Private who was bored and had time on his hands."

  17. #17
    Regular Member Fuller Malarkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The Cadre
    Posts
    1,020
    Quote Originally Posted by EMNofSeattle View Post
    funny, because in one county in Washington all police related deaths are brought before an actual jury and the family of the slain gets to have their own lawyer question the officer and witnesses, and when this jury usually acquits officers then the anti-cop people just say "well the jury was rigged" some people are never happy regardless of the set up.
    Well lets get a name on that county. I have no problem researching what led to this "jury" [me thinks this might be a "Coroner's Inquest"].
    Liberty is so strongly a part of human nature that it can be treated as a no-lose argument position.
    ~Citizen

    From the cop’s perspective, the expression “law-abiding citizen” is a functional synonym for “Properly obedient slave".

    "People are not born being "anti-cop" and believing we live in a police state. That is a result of experience."

  18. #18
    Regular Member EMNofSeattle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    S. Kitsap, Washington state
    Posts
    3,670
    Quote Originally Posted by Fuller Malarkey View Post
    Well lets get a name on that county. I have no problem researching what led to this "jury" [me thinks this might be a "Coroner's Inquest"].
    King County, all police related deaths are brought before an inquest jury (which is not actually a Coroners inquest since King County is a charter government that doesn't have an elected coroner)
    they love our milk and honey, but they preach about some other way of living, when they're running down my country man they're walkin' on the fightin side of me

    NRA Member

  19. #19
    Regular Member Fuller Malarkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The Cadre
    Posts
    1,020
    Quote Originally Posted by EMNofSeattle View Post
    King County, all police related deaths are brought before an inquest jury (which is not actually a Coroners inquest since King County is a charter government that doesn't have an elected coroner)
    Thanks for the county name. Here's some info on King County Washington Inquest Hearings:

    "Inquests are fact-finding hearings conducted before a six-member jury. Under a standing Executive Order they are routinely called to determine the causes and circumstances of any death involving a member of any law enforcement agency within King County while in the performance of his or her duties.

    Inquests provide transparency into law enforcement actions so the public may have all the facts established in a court of law. The ordering of an inquest should carry no other implication. Inquest jurors answer a series of interrogatories to determine the significant factual issues involved in the case, and it is not their purpose to determine whether any person or agency is civilly or criminally liable.

    The order signed by the Executive requests King County District Court Presiding Judge Barbara Linde to assign a judge to set a date and conduct the inquest.

    The ordering of inquests is a function vested in the county executive under the King County Code.

    Conducting Inquests in King County

    http://www.kingcounty.gov/operations...phl711aeo.aspx

    Document Code No.: PHL 7-1-1 (AEO)
    Department/Issuing Agency: County Executive Office
    Effective Date: March 16, 2010
    Approved: /s/ Dow Constantine
    Type of Action: Supersedes PHL 7-1 (AEO)
    Signed document (PDF, 398 KB)

    WHEREAS, Revised Code of Washington (RCW) Chapter 36.24 authorizes the county coroner to summon a jury to inquire into the death of a person by suspicious circumstances; and

    WHEREAS, Section 895 of the King Countycharter provides that "[a]n inquest shall be held to investigate the causes and circumstances of any death involving a member of the law enforcement agency of the county in the performance of his duties"; and

    WHEREAS, King County Code (KCC) Chapter 2.24 created a division of the medical examiner within the Seattle-King County Department of Public Health and assigned to it most of the coroner's duties under RCW Chapter 36.24, "except for the holding of inquests, which function is vested in the county executive" under KCC 2.24.110(A); and

    WHEREAS, the County Executive, in exercising the authority to hold inquests, has discretion to determine how inquest proceedings are to be conducted, and to delegate the duty of presiding over an inquest to another impartial public official, and

    WHEREAS, the County Executiveretains the ultimate responsibility for the exercise of the inquest power and the performance of the delegated duty.

    NOW, THEREFORE, I Dow Constantine, King County Executive do hereby order, direct, and implement the policies and procedures at appendix 1 and appendix 2 for conducting inquests:

    DATED this 16th day of March, 2010

    /s/ Dow Constantine, King County Executive

    ATTEST:

    /s/ Tony Adams for Carolyn Ableman, Director

    Records and Licensing Services Division

    *******

    For some reason, authorizing the county coroner to summon a jury to inquire into the death of a person by suspicious circumstances sounds a lot like a "Coroners Inquest", except in King County's case, the function of holding the coroner's inquest was bestowed upon the county executive.

    What I'm not finding is whether this inquest can indict. It doesn't sound like it functions as a Grand jury would, determining probable cause to prosecute. It looks like the jury does pretty much what the coroner does.....determine that the subject is dead, and a general conclusion as to how the subject came to be that way.
    Last edited by Fuller Malarkey; 01-07-2014 at 10:27 PM.
    Liberty is so strongly a part of human nature that it can be treated as a no-lose argument position.
    ~Citizen

    From the cop’s perspective, the expression “law-abiding citizen” is a functional synonym for “Properly obedient slave".

    "People are not born being "anti-cop" and believing we live in a police state. That is a result of experience."

  20. #20
    Regular Member Fuller Malarkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The Cadre
    Posts
    1,020
    Spokane County Washington has resisted attempts to hold Coroner's Inquests for their ever growing body pile of police inflicted deaths.

    "Coroner inquests are quasi-judicial hearings in which the circumstances surrounding a death are publicly examined. They override privacy statutes that authorities believe bar them from discussing police-involved fatalities. Washington law allows inquests; in King County, inquests are required for all officer-involved deaths and juries help determine if the deaths were justified. The process is open to the public."

    http://www.spokesman.com/stories/201...-for-inquests/
    Doesn't say anything about indictments or findings used to initiate prosecutions.

    "But Spokane County’s two medical examiners remain opposed to the idea, arguing that it would force politics into death investigations.

    Medical Examiner John Howard said coroner’s inquests, during which attorneys representing the family of the deceased can ask questions, would waste public resources.

    “It’s simply putting on a public spectacle,” Howard said. “It’s kind of like having the taxpayers pay for a deposition for them to go on a fishing trip.”

    http://www.spokesman.com/stories/201...-for-inquests/
    " Maggie McLetchie, the former legal director for the American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada, said that inquest system, which was based on King County’s, never took effect because of a legal challenge from a police union. Although courts upheld the ability to hold inquests, officials opted to toss the system. McLetchie was part of a commission that helped craft the law.

    “All it was supposed to be about was to let people know what happened,” she said. “It never saw the light of day.”
    There ya go. "Patterned after King County"....and police union restrictions? How much does union contract agreements affect what transpires at an Inquest Hearing? Every cop called plead the Fifth Amendment or invoke their Garrity Rights? If that's the case the Inquest is a joke. Further, one of the people that helped craft the law for Inquests into ploice killings states "All it was supposed to do was let people know what happened". I'd have to agree that might just be a waste of time and resources. If we know that the subject is dead and who killed them, why go any further if the effort doesn't clear or condemn the killer?
    Last edited by Fuller Malarkey; 01-07-2014 at 10:41 PM.
    Liberty is so strongly a part of human nature that it can be treated as a no-lose argument position.
    ~Citizen

    From the cop’s perspective, the expression “law-abiding citizen” is a functional synonym for “Properly obedient slave".

    "People are not born being "anti-cop" and believing we live in a police state. That is a result of experience."

  21. #21
    Regular Member Fallschirmjäger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Georgia, USA
    Posts
    3,761
    Well, dang, Fuller ya gotta go and poke holes in everything he said?

  22. #22
    Regular Member OC for ME's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    White Oak Plantation
    Posts
    11,106
    Quote Originally Posted by EMNofSeattle View Post
    funny, because in one county in Washington all police related deaths are brought before an actual jury and the family of the slain gets to have their own lawyer question the officer and witnesses, and when this jury usually acquits officers then the anti-cop people just say "well the jury was rigged" some people are never happy regardless of the set up.
    The LE industry will strive to stop any attempt by any non-LE industry entity from penetrating the Blue Wall. A cop must never be indicted from the outside, but thrown under the bus by his peers.....for the good of the department.

  23. #23
    Regular Member sudden valley gunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Whatcom County
    Posts
    16,690
    Quote Originally Posted by EMNofSeattle View Post
    funny, because in one county in Washington all police related deaths are brought before an actual jury and the family of the slain gets to have their own lawyer question the officer and witnesses, and when this jury usually acquits officers then the anti-cop people just say "well the jury was rigged" some people are never happy regardless of the set up.

    Hahaha.....Fuller beat me too it.

    It is rigged who picks the "jury"...

    Ian Birks victims family had no say in it but the parasite living symbiotically with the other parasites did.

    A grand jury that is independent of judges and prosecutors was the norm many years ago. That needs to be brought back.


    Here is a case in Houston were it worked and really irked off the prosecutor.....http://www.lewrockwell.com/2011/11/w...-grand-juries/

    FUQ
    In June, Culbertson and two of her colleagues quit their jobswith the HPD. “We could no longer choose between a paycheck and our integrity,” Culbertson explained.
    I love that good apples deciding the barrel is rotten!
    I am not anti Cop I am just pro Citizen.

    U.S. v. Minker, 350 US 179, at page 187
    "Because of what appears to be a lawful command on the surface, many citizens, because
    of their respect for what only appears to be a law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their
    rights, due to ignorance." (Paraphrased)

  24. #24
    Regular Member Maverick9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Mid-atlantic
    Posts
    1,395
    It's that way with any 'special interest group'. They see it as them versus the world.

    We know from history that the 'priest class' was quick to use their power against the people, all the while proclaiming their holiness and morality.

    Ditto the Catholic church. I'm actually worried for the life of the first good Pope we've had for a while. (the predecessors weren't necessarily bad, just ineffectual). Ask anyone who is among the most corrupt in Italy and they'll say 'the Vatican'.

    Cops are no different. THey've gotten power and will do anything to keep it, even subvert their mission. And like most people who do evil acts, don't see themselves as 'evil', just misunderstood.

    The Sergeant on the recent case of the young thug who hit this old lady as she walked out of a store and youtubed it said she thought it was just harassment. OMG, they have the kid on tape smacking this old lady in the head. Yes he had a snowball in his hand, but he hit her in the head - there was no 'snowball throwing'. Yet the female cop said it wasn't 'substantial injury' and couldn't be prosecuted. On tape, hit to the head, a crime against the elderly and she feels it's ok. Bet she wouldn't do that if it was HER grandmother.

    We're like a group of Diogenes with lamps of the 2nd and 4th Amendment looking for an honest cop. Good luck, fellas, you ain't finding one.

  25. #25
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    idaho
    Posts
    699
    People often ask me why I film the police. One simple answer is because the police lie and commit crimes.

    We need more people filming the police.

    YOU should film the police too.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •