Customer thwarts would-be bank robber

http://www.jsonline.com/news/crime/...obber-in-greenfield-b9954009z1-215392511.html

Who needs to defend themselves in a bank right?

Now in this case the bank customer will go scott free, because he didn't have a gun. I predict that if the customer did d have a gun and used it, that DA prosecuting the fist fight fracas would be prosecuting this customer to 45 years in jail.

Law abider said:

Now in this case the bank customer will go scott free, because he didn't have a gun. I predict that if the customer did d have a gun and used it, that DA prosecuting the fist fight fracas would be prosecuting this customer to 45 years in jail.

Click to expand...

Maybe maybe not.

Firearms Iinstuctor said:

Maybe maybe not.

Click to expand...

Firearms. There is a pattern. That Da rather have you beaten to a pulp or injured that you pull the trigger. I bet he would prosecute the customer if he punched the robber and the robber hit himself on the floor and was paralyzed or died. He doesn't want the victim to do anything. Just wait for leos to show up dead or alive. The system is getting carried away by subjectivism/emotionalism/ conjecturism rather than pure facts and known motives and video evidence etc...