http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2014/01...ctions-federal-court-rules/?intcmp=latestnews
I have been working on a story and video about a local police officer who I filmed one night at a DUI checkpoint. He filmed our encounter with his body worn video recorder. Later, I filed a public records request for the video.
Long story short, he and others at the department made the majority of the video go missing.
So I told them I have proof they are lying and I will be putting out a video about it. They threatened to sue me for defamation and other things. I said, go ahead, you are public officials and I am the press.
Plus, I am right and you guys are lying.
Well, I wonder if they will still be suing now ?
I can think of one person in particular on this board who is upset at this ruling. Not that this ruling changes over 200 years of constitutional protections for the press.
But...I AM THE PRESS
I have been working on a story and video about a local police officer who I filmed one night at a DUI checkpoint. He filmed our encounter with his body worn video recorder. Later, I filed a public records request for the video.
Long story short, he and others at the department made the majority of the video go missing.
So I told them I have proof they are lying and I will be putting out a video about it. They threatened to sue me for defamation and other things. I said, go ahead, you are public officials and I am the press.
Plus, I am right and you guys are lying.
Well, I wonder if they will still be suing now ?
I can think of one person in particular on this board who is upset at this ruling. Not that this ruling changes over 200 years of constitutional protections for the press.
But...I AM THE PRESS