commonsense1776
Regular Member
The anger and paranoia throughout this thread is palatable. I am absolutely amazed by it. It concerns me regarding the responsible ownership of firearms.
I would think that the Facists in various parts of the Government would use State National Guard in other parts of the country - like use Ohio guard to suppress citizens of KY or MD, and say WV against Ohioans or Indianans. Don't know whether guardsman Ohio would be hung-ho for another Kent State, but this time doing the bidding of the anarchists against everyday folks protecting their homes and families.
I still say we know where the soldiers/police/TSA people live, their families and as such there will be consequences if they violate our rights and lives. Look up MA Lt Gov Tom Hutchison when he supported King George over the Sons of Liberty and the Stamp Act.
I wonder if much of the "zeal" of participating in sanctioned invasions by government thugs would be dampened if the thugs involved had to worry that the compadres of those they were hunting down like animals were in fact closing in on the thug's digs. Tit for tat.
I suspect the voiced discontent from the Mundanes is what is behind a lot of the dispensing of vehicles of war and the arming of police with weapons of war to replace their tools of keeping the peace is to discourage a gathering of the Mundanes the next time the Occupiers throw another Ruby Ridge or Waco.
It may have been "another isolated incident" [PWI Posting While Intoxicated],what ever, the "boy" scout that wants to clean out this club house of the rabble rousers and turn this into a place decent Statists would hang around and engage in conversations that closer resemble the worship of their keepers went on what appears to be a drunken rant last night, and referenced this thread, claiming a few posts are blatant threats on the lives of little children and helpless nursing mothers, the families of galant white knights that are just following orders and conducting dark of night raids on people for their 2A beliefs.
Read it here:
http://forum.opencarry.org/forums/s...pen-carrying&p=2036689&viewfull=1#post2036689
Rather than derail that thread, I thought I'd help the drunk out and at least steer the conversation to the right thread.
So. Our boy believes posts #3 and #4 in this thread are direct threats, and he is disappointed there isn't an outcry from the decent members here, the majority, he seems to believe, that support the gallant efforts of thugs everywhere that work daily to nurture tyranny. Thugs that train and target 2A supporters as "domestic terrorists".
Seeing that the majority of the forum wasn't coming forth to dry the tears from his eyes, I thought maybe being he posted his lament in an unrelated thread, maybe the Statist Majority here simply didn't see his appeal to tragedy, his emotional reaction to his perceived threats to he and all the noble sheep dogs that keep us safe. So I redirect this whine fest back to the scene of the transgression.
Now be assured I support nothing Primus thinks, does, or posts, or even his usage of oxygen. I do welcome posters to come in and hug this whiner to shut him up. Stroke his head and tell him it will all be OK, the bad boys that just don't act right are bad and he shouldn't play with them because they like to cause trouble and make all the good gun guys look bad.
First..... a poster in THAT thread directly asked me a question and I responded.
Secomd... you can bombard the screen with useless personal insults it doesn't change a thing that has been said. It just makes you look worse and worse every word that gets typed. Im certain you get a chuckle out of it, and maybe one or two of your buddies, but at the end of the day it doesn't change a thing. Your still not worth it.
Its been quoted. Its been reported. Its been laid out there for the members of the public and more importantly this forum to see. The actions and/or lack thereof speak many times more then any of the useless statements you now utter.
You can this thread to yourself to verbally masturbate. I'll go back to speaking with guys that are worth my time. Thanks brother.
Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk
The proof is in the alternative. They could have assigned any ideologic motivation to the mock terrorists.
This is too easy. How about just anti-government terrorists? How about former federal official trying to break away a part of the state (actual case--look up Aaron Burr, the guy who killed Alexander Hamilton in a duel)? How about anti-social cultists like that bunch in Japan a few years ago that spread poison gas on a subway?
See? In under a minute I thunk up three alternatives they could have used. How many could they think up in ten minutes?
The scenario was that these "Second Amendment supporters with 'anti-government' opinions" had used biological weapons. At that point they have become domestic terrorists, regardless of whether their belief system is similar to mine or not.
The ONG is practicing responding to actions, not beliefs.
The ONG are federal troops ... I see an issue with federal troops being used to quell local disturbances, even of a very serious nature.
"Its" already been addressed, but, a "fire drill" does not require a back story to train folks how to fight a fire. The OP provides a link to what the "state" is doing and the "back story" is a important component else it would not provide value in the state's eyes. Desensitizing is the goal. If you, the average 2A supporter, can be lumped into those bio-weapons using 2A supporters, then the odds of your STATE NG relative down the street from you, shooting you because you are now a "home grown terrorist" because the state says so is more likely.+1. It's normal practice for disaster prep drills: create a scenario that plays out, including a back story to provide associated "intelligence inputs" to keep the scenario moving and developing. Sometimes it's a natural disaster, sometimes a plane crash, and sometimes a terrorist attack. They're not demonizing anybody, they're trying to develop as reasonable a scenario as possible that drives them to respond with whatever functions the exercise is intended to evaluate. <snips>
The easy answer is that the "brother" does not report. The state is not, and should not be, in the business of confronting, then provoking, "rowdy 2A supporters." Especially if being rowdy is not harming anyone.....except the state's sensibilities.....noise ordinances, "disturbing the peace" "violations" no "permit" to assemble.....IAW the 1A, that is. Nice appeal to emotion you pooped out.<snip>
I need a hot shower to scrub myself, I feel so dirty and violated for taking on any semblance of playing devil's advocate for the Gov't, or it's agents.
Yes. Read the OP again, or Google MIAC report, Missouri MIAC. The "state" is actively training their minions to engage, with violent physical force, 2A supports that do not conform to the state's definition of what a "good" 2A supporter should be.I couldn't agree more. Gives me the willies . . .
The proof of what? And what alternative are you referring to?
I agree that any of the options you suggested would have been just as useful. Are you saying the ONG used 2A supporters due to some nefarious design? I'm interested in your thoughts on this, if you've got a few minutes.
Kent State did happen.....that is the point. There are some state employees, permanent, and temps, that will shoot their fellow law abiding citizens. The state is actively training their permanent and temp workers to expand the number of workers that will, upon command, have no qualms with shooting their neighbor when directed to do so.Just for the record: As far back as 1961, <snip>
And you had no problem with searches, if you did any, without a warrant? You had no problem with your fellow military buddies doing warrantless searches? We all know that you did not have a problem, as a cop, with the warrantless 4A violations during the Boston Constitution Suspension Event.<snip> I do know my company was activated for the Boston bombing. Our roe/mission was basically just help the police if possible with searches/perimeter stuff, etc.. so we were told dont enage anyone unless it was to help the pds. We weren't even allowed firearms. The MPs were armed but we weren't allowed.
Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk
A camera and a microphone work wonders sometimes. The state will do what ir does regardless of what the law says. It is when the camera and microphone document nefarious intent and acts that the state will be reigned in.