I've been wanting to do more activism in regards to jury nullification. It worked for prohibition and slavery, and can put the nail in the coffin of gun control.
While it can be effectively, it's one of those "last bastions of justice." The steps (roughly) where justice is best served:
1. We the people, in encouraging our lawmakers ensure all laws are just, and discouraging them from making any unjust laws.
2. The lawmakers and their staffs, where unjust laws should be discarded
3. Constitutionality research, where unjust laws should be discarded.
4. The session, during which reasonable objections should result in everyone saying, "Yeah, that was a bad idea," and unjust laws are discarded.
5. LEO initial contact, where the officer sworn to support and defend the Constitution says, "yeah, that's a bad law, and we're not enforcing it."
6. Prosecuting attorney, also a sworn officer (civil) who should say, "yeah, that's a bad law, and we're not prosecuting it."
7. Judge, also a sworn officer (civil) who should say, "yeah, that's a bad law, and we're not trying it."
8. Jury, who themselves swear an oath, and should say, "yeah, that's a bad law, and we're not convicting on it."
9, 10, 11, 12, and 13. Appeals courts up to the Supreme Court
14. Governor, who can either stay, set aside, or pardon.
Jury nullification is way down the line, and by that time, the individual has already incurred tens of thousands of dollars in legal expenses. Wouldn't it be nice if We the People could simply elect legislators, researchers, law enforcement officers (chiefs), and prosecutors (their bosses who appoint them), and judges who would simply
follow the law, beginning with the "supreme Law of the Land?"