Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: WRIC Investigates: Law Enforcement fails to obey forfeiture laws

  1. #1
    Regular Member Repeater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Richmond, Virginia, USA

    WRIC Investigates: Law Enforcement fails to obey forfeiture laws

    Who knew?

    8News Investigates: Va. Law Enforcement Violating Drug Destruction Laws
    Last year, an ABC 8 News investigation exposed police agencies across the Commonwealth violating state law in how they report seized drugs. Now, lawmakers are taking action, but probably not in the way you'd expect.

    In 2013, Investigative Reporter A.J. Lagoe uncovered that most of Virginia's law enforcement agencies don't properly document how they destroy drugs they take off our streets. Since the investigation first aired, the number of police departments complying with the law has more than tripled, but hundreds of departments, including Richmond's, are still failing to follow the law they're sworn to uphold.

    Illegal narcotics seized off of Virginia's streets end up in police evidence lockers all across the Commonwealth, but they don't always stay where they belong.

    In 2006, the Henry County sheriff and several deputies were indicted for dealing cocaine, marijuana and even guns from their evidence room. Just last year, Marion Police Chief Michael Dean Roberts was busted for drug dealing out of his evidence locker.
    So, what's being done about this? Well, it seems Senator Carrico is proposing to make it even easier for LEO's to evade the law:
    Instead of an all-out effort to obey the law, there's now a law enforcement-backed effort underway in the General Assembly to do away with the mandatory reporting to the state of how narcotics are being destroyed.

    State Senator Bill Carrico, a former state trooper, is sponsoring a Virginia Sheriffs' Association-backed bill to end police agencies' duty to file drug destruction reports with the Board of Pharmacy.

    "Is there enough accountability in Virginia for what happens with drugs once they're taken off the streets?" Lagoe asked Sen. Carrico.

    "Oh, absolutely," Carrico answered. "Policing the police is always a hard thing to do, but I think integrity in that department depends upon who's appointed the head of it."

    Law enforcement heads across the Commonwealth contend filing a drug destruction report in two places—with their own court and the Virginia Board of Pharmacy—is, in a word, ludicrous.


    Sheriff Roberts says his checks and balances come from being an accredited agency; an outside body comes in and audits all of his evidence files.

    "As a sheriff, I have so much power," Roberts said. "So much power, that it almost can be scary and people abuse it. So, I tell this accreditation body, ‘Come in and inspect me.'"

    An ABC 8 News inspection found his department and numerous others are not fully in compliance with the drug destruction reporting law.

    "I certainly can't be upset that you've educated law enforcement in Virginia about [the] statute, about reporting," Roberts said.

    Sheriff Roberts says agree or disagree, the law is the law, and he and Virginia's other top cops need to follow it.

    "I got 108," Roberts said. "I got to file ‘em and I'm gonna get in compliance with the law."
    Left unsaid is the fact sheriffs are elected; chiefs are not.

    More to the point: if we can't trust police departments to obey the law regarding seized drugs, how can we trust them regarding seized guns?

    Who police the police?

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Thru Death's Door in Wisconsin
    Quote Originally Posted by Repeater View Post
    [ ... ]Who police the police?
    Their public masters must police public servants.
    If TRUMP 2016 loses then I will shrug off my WHITE MAN'S BURDEN and leave the world to the Dindus and Done Nuffins. Read and understand Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged as a prescription for the future. TRUMP 2016

  3. #3
    Regular Member TFred's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Most historic town in, Virginia, USA
    And it looks like this bill is sailing through with not even a glance. Not a single "no" vote yet.


    01/03/14 Senate: Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/08/14 14101486D
    01/03/14 Senate: Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
    01/20/14 Senate: Reported from Courts of Justice (15-Y 0-N)
    01/21/14 Senate: Constitutional reading dispensed (37-Y 0-N)
    01/22/14 Senate: Read second time and engrossed
    01/23/14 Senate: Read third time and passed Senate (38-Y 0-N)
    01/27/14 House: Placed on Calendar
    01/27/14 House: Read first time
    01/27/14 House: Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
    02/14/14 House: Assigned Courts sub: Criminal Law
    02/17/14 House: Subcommittee recommends reporting (11-Y 0-N)

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    earth's crust
    Quote Originally Posted by TFred View Post
    And it looks like this bill is sailing through with not even a glance. Not a single "no" vote yet.

    See? The system works...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts