Unlike you,
OK, this is where our gun politics discussions should focus. What are your criteria for a candidate worth voting for?
I don't believe the Libertarians are any better than the Republicans. I also don't believe everybody else but Sarvis was lying about his funding. Funny how he never denied it. Yes, he said all the right things about "gun rights".
If a politician's lips are moving, THEY ARE LYING. All of them. Nobody is pure as driven snow and all owe somebody.
"If you like your....." is a prime example and just the most current. The next best lie I have heard is about "the death throes " of the Republican party. I support candidates that actually know what the 2nd Amendment is and that it has NOTHING to do with hunting.
That leaves Warner out. Sarvis is nothing more than Idiot Joe, John Anderson, Walter Mondale or Hubert Humphrey with a Libertarian label. A known name that always loses because he has no substance or usable experience.
No, I will not support him. I know better. This is America and it is your right to support whomsoever you choose.